If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
Since the times I'm using in developing films are always shorter of
the ones in Digitaltruth, I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water (it costs me about 0.80$ for 4 litres). Next time I'm going to use it to mix ID-11. Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? From Italy. ...................................... Marco Baldovin www.whitewave.it |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
Water quality is always a variable. III suspect a lot of "serious" darkroom
workers use distilled water for mixing developers. And try to always get their distilled water from the same source! The times in Digital Truth (or any published times for that matter) can only be regarded as a point of departure for any user since your agitation pattern, equipment, personal preferences (and of course water quality!) will affect your final negative contrast and density. -- darkroommike ---------- "whitewave" wrote in message ... Since the times I'm using in developing films are always shorter of the ones in Digitaltruth, I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water (it costs me about 0.80$ for 4 litres). Next time I'm going to use it to mix ID-11. Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? From Italy. ..................................... Marco Baldovin www.whitewave.it |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
"whitewave" wrote
I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. I take it that 'heavy' means 'hard': lots of calcium etc. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? A filter will not get rid of dissolved minerals. A water softener will trade calcium for sodium and you will get salt water. Salt should result in finer grain ... ? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? DT's times should be (or so one hopes) for very pure/distilled water. If the water quality is effecting development then the effect will not be constant. Water quality varies with time of year, temperature, how much algae & bacteria is in the water, how much chlorine added .... In Cleveland the variation is profound. Since switching to distilled my negative consistency is all I can ask for. Before the switch I cursed the developer, the film, my light-meter, the shutter, the camera, the lens and myself for not being able to produce a consistently well exposed/developed negative. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. Remove spaces etc. to reply: n o lindan at net com dot com psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
"whitewave" wrote
I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. I take it that 'heavy' means 'hard': lots of calcium etc. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? A filter will not get rid of dissolved minerals. A water softener will trade calcium for sodium and you will get salt water. Salt should result in finer grain ... ? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? DT's times should be (or so one hopes) for very pure/distilled water. If the water quality is effecting development then the effect will not be constant. Water quality varies with time of year, temperature, how much algae & bacteria is in the water, how much chlorine added .... In Cleveland the variation is profound. Since switching to distilled my negative consistency is all I can ask for. Before the switch I cursed the developer, the film, my light-meter, the shutter, the camera, the lens and myself for not being able to produce a consistently well exposed/developed negative. -- Nicholas O. Lindan, Cleveland, Ohio Consulting Engineer: Electronics; Informatics; Photonics. Remove spaces etc. to reply: n o lindan at net com dot com psst.. want to buy an f-stop timer? nolindan.com/da/fstop/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
whitewave wrote:
Since the times I'm using in developing films are always shorter of the ones in Digitaltruth, I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water (it costs me about 0.80$ for 4 litres). Next time I'm going to use it to mix ID-11. Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? Distilled water is the best for developing, and for the price it's a bargain. I use commercially filtered water -- reverse osmosis, activated charcoal, and sub-micron particulate filtered -- with good results for about half the price of distilled, but depending on the local water supply used to feed the filtration dispenser, the result might or might not be acceptable for photography (areas with a lot of iron in the water, for instance, might see enough of it get through the filters to cause problems). Setting up this kind of filtration for whole house is hideously expensive, though -- reverse osmosis filters are quite spendy -- but it might be practical to set up an under-sink unit for darkroom use only; expect to spend more than $500 (US) or equivalent, and take many years to pay it back in hobby use compared to the price of distilled water from the market. Simpler and cheaper is to buy a commercial distiller made for drinking/cooking water; a unit that will produce 10 liters a day should cost less than $200, possibly as little as $100 (maybe even less where you are -- at least one such unit I'm aware of was made in Italy, if it's still in production), and with regular cleaning will produce water at least as good as what you get in those plastic jugs -- and let you keep 20 liters or more on hand if you want/need that much; operating costs are such that after you work off the cost of the unit (and they'll last decades with a little maintenance) you can produce water for a few cents a liter (at least at American power rates -- I don't know what you pay for electricity in Italy). The unit looks like a large coffee urn, all stainless steel, and can be installed under a counter etc., as long as there's room to get a jug under the tap for filling and to pull it out for periodic cleaning. Distilled water might produce a change in times compared to what you've been using, but the times on Digitaltruth are just starting times anyway; you should expect to have to adjust those times for your particular thermometer, agitation technique, water purity, even purity of chemicals and measuring techniques if you mix your own developers. Add to that your metering technique that might require adjustment of both EI and developing times to compensate, and you can see that it's impossible to say with confidence whether you'll need to change the times you get from the Massive Dev Chart -- but distilled water, in and of itself, shouldn't make a big difference. -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
whitewave wrote:
Since the times I'm using in developing films are always shorter of the ones in Digitaltruth, I took infos on the quality of the water coming out from my house. It's heavy, very heavy. So yesterday I bought 15 litres of distilled water (it costs me about 0.80$ for 4 litres). Next time I'm going to use it to mix ID-11. Is it right? Or is it better to buy a specific filter for darkroom use? Are the times for distilled water different from Digitaltruth's ones? Distilled water is the best for developing, and for the price it's a bargain. I use commercially filtered water -- reverse osmosis, activated charcoal, and sub-micron particulate filtered -- with good results for about half the price of distilled, but depending on the local water supply used to feed the filtration dispenser, the result might or might not be acceptable for photography (areas with a lot of iron in the water, for instance, might see enough of it get through the filters to cause problems). Setting up this kind of filtration for whole house is hideously expensive, though -- reverse osmosis filters are quite spendy -- but it might be practical to set up an under-sink unit for darkroom use only; expect to spend more than $500 (US) or equivalent, and take many years to pay it back in hobby use compared to the price of distilled water from the market. Simpler and cheaper is to buy a commercial distiller made for drinking/cooking water; a unit that will produce 10 liters a day should cost less than $200, possibly as little as $100 (maybe even less where you are -- at least one such unit I'm aware of was made in Italy, if it's still in production), and with regular cleaning will produce water at least as good as what you get in those plastic jugs -- and let you keep 20 liters or more on hand if you want/need that much; operating costs are such that after you work off the cost of the unit (and they'll last decades with a little maintenance) you can produce water for a few cents a liter (at least at American power rates -- I don't know what you pay for electricity in Italy). The unit looks like a large coffee urn, all stainless steel, and can be installed under a counter etc., as long as there's room to get a jug under the tap for filling and to pull it out for periodic cleaning. Distilled water might produce a change in times compared to what you've been using, but the times on Digitaltruth are just starting times anyway; you should expect to have to adjust those times for your particular thermometer, agitation technique, water purity, even purity of chemicals and measuring techniques if you mix your own developers. Add to that your metering technique that might require adjustment of both EI and developing times to compensate, and you can see that it's impossible to say with confidence whether you'll need to change the times you get from the Massive Dev Chart -- but distilled water, in and of itself, shouldn't make a big difference. -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
Hard water has one advantage to B&W photographers: it washes film faster than soft water. So if you want to save some of the precious filtered/distilled, then use hard water to wash, then do a final brief rinse in filtered water. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
Hard water has one advantage to B&W photographers: it washes film faster than soft water. So if you want to save some of the precious filtered/distilled, then use hard water to wash, then do a final brief rinse in filtered water. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
jjs wrote:
Hard water has one advantage to B&W photographers: it washes film faster than soft water. So if you want to save some of the precious filtered/distilled, then use hard water to wash, then do a final brief rinse in filtered water. Well, but with the disadvantage that hard water is guaranteed to spot if it dries on your film -- alkalinity improves washing, but you can alkalize wash water (if needed) with a little baking soda. Better still to use an alkaline fixer, to gain the fast wash, and wash with distilled or reverse osmosis filtered water. If you use the Ilford method to wash, you can archivally wash and PhotoFlo treat two rolls of 120 or four rolls of 35 mm in a 32 ounce tank with one gallon of distilled or filtered water, costing between 35 and 90 cents. The Ilford wash takes less than five minutes (fill, invert five times, dump; fill, invert ten times, dump; fill, invert 20 times, dump, and PhotoFlo with fresh water). Nothing gained by using hard water, and too much risk of leaving a little calcium carbonate on the film to dry... -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
weight of my water
jjs wrote:
Hard water has one advantage to B&W photographers: it washes film faster than soft water. So if you want to save some of the precious filtered/distilled, then use hard water to wash, then do a final brief rinse in filtered water. Well, but with the disadvantage that hard water is guaranteed to spot if it dries on your film -- alkalinity improves washing, but you can alkalize wash water (if needed) with a little baking soda. Better still to use an alkaline fixer, to gain the fast wash, and wash with distilled or reverse osmosis filtered water. If you use the Ilford method to wash, you can archivally wash and PhotoFlo treat two rolls of 120 or four rolls of 35 mm in a 32 ounce tank with one gallon of distilled or filtered water, costing between 35 and 90 cents. The Ilford wash takes less than five minutes (fill, invert five times, dump; fill, invert ten times, dump; fill, invert 20 times, dump, and PhotoFlo with fresh water). Nothing gained by using hard water, and too much risk of leaving a little calcium carbonate on the film to dry... -- I may be a scwewy wabbit, but I'm not going to Alcatwaz! -- E. J. Fudd, 1954 Donald Qualls, aka The Silent Observer Lathe Building Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/HomebuiltLathe.htm Speedway 7x12 Lathe Pages http://silent1.home.netcom.com/my7x12.htm Opinions expressed are my own -- take them for what they're worth and don't expect them to be perfect. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Olympus C-720 water damage | Petebert | Digital Photography | 0 | July 8th 04 12:34 AM |
new vanadium toner | Wilco Oelen | In The Darkroom | 8 | June 27th 04 12:52 AM |
Spots! | Chris Loffredo | In The Darkroom | 10 | June 13th 04 06:08 AM |
Develper for Delta-100 | Frank Pittel | In The Darkroom | 8 | March 1st 04 04:36 PM |
Photoceramic processess | Biesior | In The Darkroom | 8 | February 3rd 04 12:55 PM |