If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
20D HITS THE FIELD !!!
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Annika1980" wrote in message ... http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Annika1980" wrote in message
... From: "Mark M" http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" ooh. The flash... no wonder the blur in the background is so funny - unflattering. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Annika1980" wrote in message ... From: "Mark M" http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" Ah. There's no sky visible... At least you thought to use 2nd curtain synch... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Mark M" wrote in message news:nIq7d.12629$Hz.9309@fed1read04... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... From: "Mark M" http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" Ah. There's no sky visible... At least you thought to use 2nd curtain synch... Hi, saw the reference to 2nd. curtain synch. Could you please explain the difference from 1st curtain? I keep on seeing these terms mentioned but have never found an explanation for them. Regards Len |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Len
writes saw the reference to 2nd. curtain synch. Could you please explain the difference from 1st curtain? I keep on seeing these terms mentioned but have never found an explanation for them. With first curtain you fire the flash as soon as the first half of the focal plain shutter is open and might get blurring of your subject due to them reacting to the flash during the ambient light exposure before the second curtain closes, with second the flash fires just as the second curtain states to cover the film/sensor and so response occur after the shutter has closed. -- Ian G8ILZ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:23:24 +0100, "Len"
wrote: "Mark M" wrote in message news:nIq7d.12629$Hz.9309@fed1read04... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... From: "Mark M" http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" Ah. There's no sky visible... At least you thought to use 2nd curtain synch... Hi, saw the reference to 2nd. curtain synch. Could you please explain the difference from 1st curtain? I keep on seeing these terms mentioned but have never found an explanation for them. Regards Len It means the flash goes off just before the shutter closes, 1st curtian means the flash is fired just after the shutter opens. The problem with first curtian is that when there are moving objects any motion blur is after the initial flash... so if you where shooting say someone running from left to right they would be frozen by the flash at the left side then you would see the blur/ghost image of thier movement to the right... The movement trails/blur should be behind the frozen person, so it ends up looking wrong. If you cant picture the above visually, think of a comic book picture of someone running (say road runner, beep beep, lol) where tbey put the speed trails behind the person, with first curtain sync they would have to draw the character with the speed trails in front of the runner. -- Jonathan Wilson. www.somethingerotic.com |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004 11:23:24 +0100, "Len"
wrote: "Mark M" wrote in message news:nIq7d.12629$Hz.9309@fed1read04... "Annika1980" wrote in message ... From: "Mark M" http://www.pbase.com/bret/image/34504445 Why are you shooting at 4f? Isn't this shot with your 70-200 2.8 L? 1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" Ah. There's no sky visible... At least you thought to use 2nd curtain synch... Hi, saw the reference to 2nd. curtain synch. Could you please explain the difference from 1st curtain? I keep on seeing these terms mentioned but have never found an explanation for them. Regards Len It means the flash goes off just before the shutter closes, 1st curtian means the flash is fired just after the shutter opens. The problem with first curtian is that when there are moving objects any motion blur is after the initial flash... so if you where shooting say someone running from left to right they would be frozen by the flash at the left side then you would see the blur/ghost image of thier movement to the right... The movement trails/blur should be behind the frozen person, so it ends up looking wrong. If you cant picture the above visually, think of a comic book picture of someone running (say road runner, beep beep, lol) where tbey put the speed trails behind the person, with first curtain sync they would have to draw the character with the speed trails in front of the runner. -- Jonathan Wilson. www.somethingerotic.com |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, Annika1980 wrote:
1/250 could have been a crispy 1/350 or more at 2.8, and yes...you'd still have some obvious and nice motion effects... Can you say "flash sync?" Should have bought a D70 then. ;-) (ducks and runs for cover) NB. I like your images. -- Jose Marques |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Decrease depth of field with telephoto attachment? | Jon Harris | Digital Photography | 2 | September 19th 04 06:31 AM |
roll-film back: DOF question | RSD99 | Large Format Photography Equipment | 41 | July 30th 04 03:12 AM |
Depth of Field Preview Question: | Michael P Gabriel | Digital Photography | 6 | June 25th 04 11:29 PM |