If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable Density B&W Film
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message s.com... And why, pray tell, would I want to do that? Just as I may ask why we (the U.S., and even, for that matter, parts of the UK) should abandon our venerable measurement system in favor of the metric system? (Don't know if you're aware of it, but there's *trememdous* oppostion to metrificiation both here in the U.S. and abroad.) Much more rational to measure things based on the standard of the Supreme Leader's body parts! The USA has its head up its ass in far more ways than I can enumerate in one post... But then again, we've long since given up being "reality based." rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
rafe b spake thus:
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message s.com... And why, pray tell, would I want to do that? Just as I may ask why we (the U.S., and even, for that matter, parts of the UK) should abandon our venerable measurement system in favor of the metric system? (Don't know if you're aware of it, but there's *trememdous* oppostion to metrificiation both here in the U.S. and abroad.) Much more rational to measure things based on the standard of the Supreme Leader's body parts! Well, at least it was based on *someone's* body parts, instead of an arbitrary, disembodied, intangible numerical concept. The USA has its head up its ass in far more ways than I can enumerate in one post... But then again, we've long since given up being "reality based." Certainly no argument there from this quarter, Rafe. But in this case, we're right: kind of like the stopped clock and all that. -- Just as McDonald's is where you go when you're hungry but don't really care about the quality of your food, Wikipedia is where you go when you're curious but don't really care about the quality of your knowledge. - Matthew White's WikiWatch (http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable Density B&W Film
In message m, David
Nebenzahl writes Chris Hills spake thus: In message m, David Nebenzahl writes Jean-David Beyer spake thus: Now ordinary printing paper, in USA, came from the size of the frame commonly used for making paper by hand that turned out 17 by 22 inch sheets after the deckle edge was trimmed off. This was about the largest they could make sheets for a long time. These where cut in half both ways making 8½ by 11 sheets as standard for printing (and later, typewriting). OK, so where did that Yurpeen standard, A4, come from? A4 is NOT European It is International and is used EVERYWHERE except the USA. see http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-paper.html Some points from the link: "The United States, Canada, and in part Mexico, are today the only industrialized nations in which the ISO standard paper sizes are not yet widely used." "If you live in the U.S. and have never been abroad, you might not be aware that paper and accessories in the North-American sizes are not commonly available outside the U.S. or Canada. They are very difficult to obtain in any other country" Interestingly:- "Although it is rarely advertised, ISO A4 laser printer and copying paper, as well as suitable files and folders, are available today from many U.S. office supply companies. A4 paper and supplies are regularly ordered in the U.S. today, especially by companies and organizations with a lot of international correspondence, including patent lawyers, diplomats, universities, and some government agencies. It seems that in the U.S., at the moment, only higher-quality paper brands are easily available in A4, i.e. the types of paper preferred for important documents, such as international patent applications. Many of the larger stationery chains do offer at least one type of A4 paper in their catalogues, but not all shops keep it on stock routinely and might have to order it first." So eventually the US might start using standard paper sizes that fit in with the rest of the world. And why, pray tell, would I want to do that? Just as I may ask why we (the U.S., and even, for that matter, parts of the UK) The UK has been metric for some time. In fact you will be hard pressed to find anyone under the age of 35 who even knows what the non-metric systems are. should abandon our venerable measurement system Venerable.... How old is the US? There is nothing Venerable it the USA. in favor of the metric system? (Don't know if you're aware of it, but there's *trememdous* oppostion to metrificiation both here in the U.S. and abroad.) There is tremendous opposition in the US but I have not seen any opposition in industry or commerce anywhere else in the world. Where it is it is from people over 50 who want to use the old systems in the markets. Why should I embrace a system that's Universally used in the rest of the world? No thanks. I'll stick to *my* "letter" and "legal" and "tabloid" sizes any day. Which is what appears to be the case for the forseeable future here, despite the urgent wishes of the Internationalizers and the Yurpeenizers. The don't expect to be part of the rest of the world. -- \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ \/\/\/\/\ Chris Hills Staffs England /\/\/\/\/ /\/\/ www.phaedsys.org \/\/\ \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable Density B&W Film
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message s.com... Well, at least it was based on *someone's* body parts, instead of an arbitrary, disembodied, intangible numerical concept. What's so arbitrary about this: one cubic centimeter of water equals one gram. Sounds pretty rational to me. Is there any substance more ubiquitous (or more germane to human life) than H2O? I've lived with them all my life but English units of weight, length and volume are utterly irrational. 5280 feet per mile. What were they thinking? For smallish distances I'm much more comfortable with millimeters than fractions-of-an-inch. For smallish volumes, I'm much more comfortable with milliliters than "ounces." First-order conversion is trivial. A meter is a yard. A liter = a quart. An inch = 2.5 cm. Etc. etc. rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
In article m,
David Nebenzahl wrote: Why should I embrace a system that's cold and based on some abstract notions, such as an aspect ratio based on the square root of two, where the primary size (A0) from which the others are derived is defined, arbitrarily, as having an area of one square meter? It's all neat and consistent--and totally arbitrary, having nothing to do with real-world historical proportions and dimensions. Because in metric world the use of units is much more practical. I guess that people in the US want to slow down daily life, because of some false sense of tradition. You don't have to know whether a measurement is supposed to be expressed in centimeters or in meters, because most people can easily divide or multiply by hundred. I wonder how many people in US can converted between inches, feet, yards and miles without resorting to tables of calculators? The same thing with the ISO paper series. You always know the name of the size one bigger or smaller than the one you are currently using. If you layout for A3, you can just proof on A4. Or print two A4s on an A3 and put a staple in the middle. Fortunately, the US did decide to go metric for the electricity (Volt, Ampere, Watt). And for some strange reason, focal lengths are metric, and are using the strange square root of two series for aperture stops. Another strange thing is that money in the US is metric, whereas most European countries had very long traditions with non-metric systems. -- That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make. -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
Philip Homburg spake thus:
In article m, David Nebenzahl wrote: Why should I embrace a system that's cold and based on some abstract notions, such as an aspect ratio based on the square root of two, where the primary size (A0) from which the others are derived is defined, arbitrarily, as having an area of one square meter? It's all neat and consistent--and totally arbitrary, having nothing to do with real-world historical proportions and dimensions. Because in metric world the use of units is much more practical. I guess that people in the US want to slow down daily life, because of some false sense of tradition. "More practical"? Not necessarily; that's a glib assumption, based on the supposed ease of doing arithmetic in decimal units, that's not always borne out in reality. I can tell you that in at least two fields which rely heavily on measurements, here in the U.S., both the printing and building industries happily and reliably use non-metric measurements, and are likely to do so for the forseeable future. In the case of printing, I have *never*--not once--been in a situation where it would be advantageous--or even possible--to divide a measurement by 10. Not even if one is printing something 10-up on a sheet does this ever arise. So much for the vaunted advantage of metric measure. Every single shop I've worked in over here, including one I owned, used inches and fractions of inches exclusively. The one concession that printers must make to the great Metric gods is that foreign presses (namely Heidelberg) require you to make settings in mm and cm; what most printers do at this point is simply convert the sheet size in inches to mm and input it. Even carpenters and cabinetmakers, who one would imagine would have more opportunities to divide a length into equal parts which might conceivably be easier with metric measures, happily, easily and accurately use feet, inches and fractions of inches. Also not likely to change in the forseeable future. You don't have to know whether a measurement is supposed to be expressed in centimeters or in meters, because most people can easily divide or multiply by hundred. I wonder how many people in US can converted between inches, feet, yards and miles without resorting to tables of calculators? For the most part, we can't "converted" (sic) without use of a calculator. But again, the much-hyped ability to multiply or divide by tens just by moving a decimal point is, in most cases, not useful. The same thing with the ISO paper series. You always know the name of the size one bigger or smaller than the one you are currently using. If you layout for A3, you can just proof on A4. Or print two A4s on an A3 and put a staple in the middle. Well, we primitives over here have the same thing. For instance, two letter-size sheets (8-1/2 x 11") fit exactly on one tabloid sheet (11 x 17"). And remembering a small number of paper sizes doesn't tax one's brain too much. Fortunately, the US did decide to go metric for the electricity (Volt, Ampere, Watt). Well, that's because there's no alternative system for those quantities. Besides, I don't see what's particularly "metric" about any of those measures, apart from the use of decimal multiples and divisions (millivolt, kilowatt, etc.). -- Just as McDonald's is where you go when you're hungry but don't really care about the quality of your food, Wikipedia is where you go when you're curious but don't really care about the quality of your knowledge. - Matthew White's WikiWatch (http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm) |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable Density B&W Film
"David Nebenzahl" wrote in message s.com... I can tell you that in at least two fields which rely heavily on measurements, here in the U.S., both the printing and building industries happily and reliably use non-metric measurements, and are likely to do so for the forseeable future. Fortunately in certain places where these things matter (eg., pure science, high-tech, wafer fabrication, etc.) metric measurements are well established and accepted. It still strikes me as strange that when I fire up Indesign I have to deal with points, picas, em-dashes, and similar arcanery. Kinda like my digicam with its synthesized shutter noise -- a pacifier for folks wedded to "tradition." rafe b www.terrapinphoto.com |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
In article m,
David Nebenzahl wrote: In the case of printing, I have *never*--not once--been in a situation where it would be advantageous--or even possible--to divide a measurement by 10. Not even if one is printing something 10-up on a sheet does this ever arise. So much for the vaunted advantage of metric measure. So, if you have a roll of paper, is the length listed in inches? (Is that called a web-press?) Are billboards sized in inches? Every single shop I've worked in over here, including one I owned, used inches and fractions of inches exclusively. How how do you deal with the weight of paper. Is that the weight per square inch. Even carpenters and cabinetmakers, who one would imagine would have more opportunities to divide a length into equal parts which might conceivably be easier with metric measures, happily, easily and accurately use feet, inches and fractions of inches. Also not likely to change in the forseeable future. And I guess they also buy their wood in inches? The same thing with the ISO paper series. You always know the name of the size one bigger or smaller than the one you are currently using. If you layout for A3, you can just proof on A4. Or print two A4s on an A3 and put a staple in the middle. Well, we primitives over here have the same thing. For instance, two letter-size sheets (8-1/2 x 11") fit exactly on one tabloid sheet (11 x 17"). And remembering a small number of paper sizes doesn't tax one's brain too much. So what is one bigger than tabloid of one smaller than letter? Fortunately, the US did decide to go metric for the electricity (Volt, Ampere, Watt). Well, that's because there's no alternative system for those quantities. Besides, I don't see what's particularly "metric" about any of those measures, apart from the use of decimal multiples and divisions (millivolt, kilowatt, etc.). Apart from the factor that a watt is one joule per second and a joule is one newton meter, and a newton is one kilogram meter per second squared. And the ampere is specified as two (infinite) parallel wires at a distance of one meter with a resulting force of 2e-7 N per meter wire. No, it has nothing to do with metric. -- That was it. Done. The faulty Monk was turned out into the desert where it could believe what it liked, including the idea that it had been hard done by. It was allowed to keep its horse, since horses were so cheap to make. -- Douglas Adams in Dirk Gently's Holistic Detective Agency |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Different Formats for Different Countries -- Variable DensityB&W Film
Philip Homburg spake thus:
In article m, David Nebenzahl wrote: In the case of printing, I have *never*--not once--been in a situation where it would be advantageous--or even possible--to divide a measurement by 10. Not even if one is printing something 10-up on a sheet does this ever arise. So much for the vaunted advantage of metric measure. So, if you have a roll of paper, is the length listed in inches? (Is that called a web-press?) Yep, although we dispense with the hyphens; it's just a web press. (The paper is the web.) Are billboards sized in inches? Yep. Every single shop I've worked in over here, including one I owned, used inches and fractions of inches exclusively. How how do you deal with the weight of paper. Is that the weight per square inch. Now *that* is a mess under our system; every type of paper has what's called a "basis weight", which is the weight of 500 sheets (a ream) at the "basis size", which of course is different for every type of paper. So we have, for example, 50 lb. "offset" or text paper, which is (approx.) the same weight as 20 lb. bond. Go figure. But we still manage, and it really doesn't make that much difference. Why? Because you never have to do arithmetic with the weights; they're simply used to specify weights of paper, and everyone in the trade (designers & printers) knows what they are. (Unless, of course, you're a paper manufacturer or wholesaler and have to figure shipping costs or something.) Even carpenters and cabinetmakers, who one would imagine would have more opportunities to divide a length into equal parts which might conceivably be easier with metric measures, happily, easily and accurately use feet, inches and fractions of inches. Also not likely to change in the forseeable future. And I guess they also buy their wood in inches? Yep. 2x4s (nominally 2 x 4", actually 1-1/2" x 3-1/2" due to planing), and almost everything flat comes in 4x8' sheets. The same thing with the ISO paper series. You always know the name of the size one bigger or smaller than the one you are currently using. If you layout for A3, you can just proof on A4. Or print two A4s on an A3 and put a staple in the middle. Well, we primitives over here have the same thing. For instance, two letter-size sheets (8-1/2 x 11") fit exactly on one tabloid sheet (11 x 17"). And remembering a small number of paper sizes doesn't tax one's brain too much. So what is one bigger than tabloid of one smaller than letter? If I understand your question, that would be 17 x 22", long a standard size of paper. -- Just as McDonald's is where you go when you're hungry but don't really care about the quality of your food, Wikipedia is where you go when you're curious but don't really care about the quality of your knowledge. - Matthew White's WikiWatch (http://users.erols.com/mwhite28/wikiwoo.htm) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Variable Density B&W Greyscale Film for monoaural audio | Radium | Film & Labs | 0 | October 9th 06 04:47 AM |
Film Cameras Forever! | Jeremy | 35mm Photo Equipment | 32 | March 31st 06 02:54 AM |
Pro film dropping faster then consumer | Scott W | 35mm Photo Equipment | 51 | February 13th 06 09:25 PM |
Loading film onto reel problems | Ron Purdue | In The Darkroom | 24 | February 7th 05 03:09 PM |