If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pentax *istD can't exploit fast cards such as Lexar WA cards
I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology -
any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. I have had a long on-line dialogue with Lexar support, and a substantial telephone conversation with a Lexar technician. The conclusion appears to be that the Pentax *istD is incapable of writing to ANY card much better than 2MB per second, whatever the speed of the card or the acceleration technology supposedly used. This suggests that if you want faster write speed than 2MB per second, don't buy a Pentax *istD. And if you have a Pentax *istD, you may see no performance advantage from a card that is significantly faster than 2MB per second. The bottleneck appears to be in the Pentax, not in the card. And that applies to Sandisk Ultra II cards too. In the Lexar labs, their bus analyser shows that the Pentax does indeed use the WA standard. But it takes 5.7 seconds to transfer 14MB, even without the extra overheads that the Pentax needs to store a Raw file. Lexar's tests of the Pentax writing to a Sandisk Ultra II card was 6 seconds, very little difference. The 7 seconds I was seeing for a 13MB file included overheads that their bus analyser wasn't looking at. All these figures are probably reasonably consistent. Lexar promote the fact that the Pentax *istD supports WA technology. But the slowest Lexar card with WA technology is far faster than the Pentax can handle even WITHOUT WA technology! It may be that WA technology in the Pentax *istD is totally irrelevant, used for mutual Pentax/Lexar promotion, not for photographer benefit. -- Barry Pearson www.barry.pearson.name/photography |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Barry Pearson says... I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. Most digital cameras including DSLRs can't keep up with the fastest memory cards. Even DLRs seem to top out at about 5-6MB/s, with the exception of the E300 which reaches 9MB/s sustained. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 4040, 5050, 5060, 7070, 8080, E300 forum at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ Olympus E300 resource - http://myolympus.org/E300/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com,
Barry Pearson says... I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. Most digital cameras including DSLRs can't keep up with the fastest memory cards. Even DLRs seem to top out at about 5-6MB/s, with the exception of the E300 which reaches 9MB/s sustained. -- Alfred Molon ------------------------------ Olympus 4040, 5050, 5060, 7070, 8080, E300 forum at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ Olympus E300 resource - http://myolympus.org/E300/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Barry Pearson writes ...
I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second This sounds about right, the Canon 10D only does about 1.4 MB/sec with that card, the Canon 20D about 5.7 MB/sec (from Galbraith's tests). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
It is like CD-Rs. The speed is determined by the divice that writes, until
you each the maximum writable speed of the media. I buy CD-Rs that are capable of being written by my fastestburner, which is somewhere around 40x, but use the same CDs in my older 24x and 8x writers too. -- http://www.chapelhillnoir.com home of The Camera-ist's Manifesto The Improved Links Pages are at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/links/mlinks00.html A sample chapter from "Haight-Ashbury" is at http://www.chapelhillnoir.com/writ/hait/hatitl.html "Barry Pearson" wrote in message oups.com... I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. I have had a long on-line dialogue with Lexar support, and a substantial telephone conversation with a Lexar technician. The conclusion appears to be that the Pentax *istD is incapable of writing to ANY card much better than 2MB per second, whatever the speed of the card or the acceleration technology supposedly used. This suggests that if you want faster write speed than 2MB per second, don't buy a Pentax *istD. And if you have a Pentax *istD, you may see no performance advantage from a card that is significantly faster than 2MB per second. The bottleneck appears to be in the Pentax, not in the card. And that applies to Sandisk Ultra II cards too. In the Lexar labs, their bus analyser shows that the Pentax does indeed use the WA standard. But it takes 5.7 seconds to transfer 14MB, even without the extra overheads that the Pentax needs to store a Raw file. Lexar's tests of the Pentax writing to a Sandisk Ultra II card was 6 seconds, very little difference. The 7 seconds I was seeing for a 13MB file included overheads that their bus analyser wasn't looking at. All these figures are probably reasonably consistent. Lexar promote the fact that the Pentax *istD supports WA technology. But the slowest Lexar card with WA technology is far faster than the Pentax can handle even WITHOUT WA technology! It may be that WA technology in the Pentax *istD is totally irrelevant, used for mutual Pentax/Lexar promotion, not for photographer benefit. -- Barry Pearson www.barry.pearson.name/photography |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article .com, Barry Pearson says... I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. Most digital cameras including DSLRs can't keep up with the fastest memory cards. Even DLRs seem to top out at about 5-6MB/s, with the exception of the E300 which reaches 9MB/s sustained. The Pentax *istD is a digital SLR, with Write Acceleration technology. I wish it could reach 5-6MB/s! I suspect that it will never exceed 2MB/sec whatever the card. I bought it because of my investment in lenses & flashguns, etc. Perhaps I should have accepted the cost of replacing the whole lot (probably with Canon). It is a competent camera, (and light), but Pentax have lost their way, and I would only recommend it to anyone else with a major investment in Pentax lenses. -- Barry Pearson www.barry.pearson.name/photography |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Alfred Molon wrote:
In article .com, Barry Pearson says... I raised this subject in a thread "Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience?". (No responses!) I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second even without Write Acceleration technology, and should be up to 23% faster with WA technology. Most digital cameras including DSLRs can't keep up with the fastest memory cards. Even DLRs seem to top out at about 5-6MB/s, with the exception of the E300 which reaches 9MB/s sustained. The Pentax *istD is a digital SLR, with Write Acceleration technology. I wish it could reach 5-6MB/s! I suspect that it will never exceed 2MB/sec whatever the card. I bought it because of my investment in lenses & flashguns, etc. Perhaps I should have accepted the cost of replacing the whole lot (probably with Canon). It is a competent camera, (and light), but Pentax have lost their way, and I would only recommend it to anyone else with a major investment in Pentax lenses. -- Barry Pearson www.barry.pearson.name/photography |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com,
Bill Hilton wrote: Barry Pearson writes ... I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second This sounds about right, the Canon 10D only does about 1.4 MB/sec with that card, the Canon 20D about 5.7 MB/sec (from Galbraith's tests). This seems to be a really big issue for some people. One can't help but think that if they wanted to shoot continuous video, they'd be better off with a video camera. That way, they get to record their continuous stream of pictures, and don't have to put up with the mirror flapping about between frames. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com,
Bill Hilton wrote: Barry Pearson writes ... I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second This sounds about right, the Canon 10D only does about 1.4 MB/sec with that card, the Canon 20D about 5.7 MB/sec (from Galbraith's tests). This seems to be a really big issue for some people. One can't help but think that if they wanted to shoot continuous video, they'd be better off with a video camera. That way, they get to record their continuous stream of pictures, and don't have to put up with the mirror flapping about between frames. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Chris Brown wrote:
In article . com, Bill Hilton wrote: Barry Pearson writes ... I wondered why my Pentax was only writing to a Lexar 80x WA card at 2MB per second, although the card supports 12MB per second This sounds about right, the Canon 10D only does about 1.4 MB/sec with that card, the Canon 20D about 5.7 MB/sec (from Galbraith's tests). This seems to be a really big issue for some people. One can't help but think that if they wanted to shoot continuous video, they'd be better off with a video camera. That way, they get to record their continuous stream of pictures, and don't have to put up with the mirror flapping about between frames. I was talking about shooting Raw photographs, not video. The Pentax *istD appears to be limited to taking about 13 Raw photographs within the first 60 seconds of switching it on, even with the fastest cards. Or one Raw photograph every 7 seconds if sustained over minutes. That is quite slow when shooting people or animals in motion. --=20 Barry Pearson=20 www.barry.pearson.name/photogr=ADaphy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pentax *istD & Lexar WA technology - any experience? | Barry Pearson | Digital Photography | 0 | April 12th 05 03:42 PM |
Compact Flash Cards - what is fast enough | cambium | Digital Photography | 7 | January 7th 05 05:54 PM |
Compact Flash Cards - what is fast enough | cambium | Digital Photography | 0 | January 6th 05 08:54 PM |
Fast CF Cards ? | Al Dykes | Digital Photography | 15 | August 5th 04 09:26 PM |
Pentax 645 vs. Mamiya 645 | Mehawitchi | Medium Format Photography Equipment | 4 | April 5th 04 03:12 PM |