If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
"David J Taylor" wrote in message .uk... Rob "r.weekhout"@" wrote: [] I'm thinking about the KM A200. Not shure yet I like the 28-200 mm (not so many do have such a lens) Rather nice video (for a photo camera !) 8 megapixels RAW Not too heavy camera an rather small Manual zoom But I've been made a little bit afraid af all the postings on the several FORUM about "dull" images. Anyone can help me out ?? You might be best to try one out for yourself. I tried the KM A2 and rejected it for various reasons, but not "dull" images. The manual zoom was nice, as was the resolution of the viewfinder (EVF). I'm coming to this thread late, but would you mind posting the reasons you rejected this camera? Thanks, Hark Cheers, David |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Harkhof wrote:
[] I'm coming to this thread late, but would you mind posting the reasons you rejected this camera? Thanks, Hark I've written about this before but: - the images did not deliver the quality I expected - the images were no better than the Nikon 5700 the Minolta A2 was due to replace - in-camera JPEG mode had nasty artefacts, requiring that you shoot RAW. (The software supplied RAW to JPEG convertor didn't have these artefacts). - there were faults in the Minolta A1 which were not fixed in the A2 - the image stabilisation indicated that it didn't work at lower shutter speeds (e.g. 1/10s) - the viewfinder was of "tinny" construction and did not articulate fully Cheers, David |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
"David J Taylor" wrote in message . uk... Harkhof wrote: [] I'm coming to this thread late, but would you mind posting the reasons you rejected this camera? Thanks, Hark I've written about this before but: - the images did not deliver the quality I expected - the images were no better than the Nikon 5700 the Minolta A2 was due to replace - in-camera JPEG mode had nasty artefacts, requiring that you shoot RAW. (The software supplied RAW to JPEG convertor didn't have these artefacts). - there were faults in the Minolta A1 which were not fixed in the A2 - the image stabilisation indicated that it didn't work at lower shutter speeds (e.g. 1/10s) - the viewfinder was of "tinny" construction and did not articulate fully Cheers, David Thanks, David! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CHARTER: rec.photo.digital.zlr | David J Taylor | Digital ZLR Cameras | 73 | March 17th 05 06:32 AM |
what is ZLR? | WD me | Digital ZLR Cameras | 38 | February 16th 05 06:17 PM |
poll - did you miss the voting about dividing r.p.d? | Roland Karlsson | Digital Photography | 271 | October 27th 04 01:21 AM |