If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
A SOOC JPEG vs RAW Comparison
All the various Fuji oriented sites have gone on, and on at how good
the JPEGs are straight out of the camera (SOOC) with the Fuji X-Series. I have been shooting RAW+JPEG, but up until this weekend I have not bothered to even look at the JPEGs. So when I did just that with my Triathlon bikers shots from Saturday I was quite surprised to see just how good the SOOC JPEGs were, and beyond a crop they did not need any adjustment, and could be shared as shot. Needless to say the RAW files needed all the help post could give them. So here is a side-by-side comparison of an unadjusted RAW and SOOC JPEG. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_79a.jpg That comparison made, I suspect that there are going to be quite a number of my future shots where I will share some SOOC JPEGs as the camera cooks them. -- Regards, Savageduck |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
A SOOC JPEG vs RAW Comparison
Savageduck wrote:
All the various Fuji oriented sites have gone on, and on at how good the JPEGs are straight out of the camera (SOOC) with the Fuji X-Series. I have been shooting RAW+JPEG, but up until this weekend I have not bothered to even look at the JPEGs. So when I did just that with my Triathlon bikers shots from Saturday I was quite surprised to see just how good the SOOC JPEGs were, and beyond a crop they did not need any adjustment, and could be shared as shot. Needless to say the RAW files needed all the help post could give them. So here is a side-by-side comparison of an unadjusted RAW and SOOC JPEG. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_79a.jpg That comparison made, I suspect that there are going to be quite a number of my future shots where I will share some SOOC JPEGs as the camera cooks them. Thanks for the interesting comparison. I do not remember the details, but I recently read in a review of a new camera, that the (finest setting) JPEGs were at least equal to the RAW images, sooc. It's fascinating. When in doubt, I run tests for image quality both on-screen and at 8x10" prints. Occasionally, I am quite surprised. Mort Linder |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
A SOOC JPEG vs RAW Comparison
On 2016-05-03 01:39:00 +0000, Mort said:
Savageduck wrote: All the various Fuji oriented sites have gone on, and on at how good the JPEGs are straight out of the camera (SOOC) with the Fuji X-Series. I have been shooting RAW+JPEG, but up until this weekend I have not bothered to even look at the JPEGs. So when I did just that with my Triathlon bikers shots from Saturday I was quite surprised to see just how good the SOOC JPEGs were, and beyond a crop they did not need any adjustment, and could be shared as shot. Needless to say the RAW files needed all the help post could give them. So here is a side-by-side comparison of an unadjusted RAW and SOOC JPEG. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_79a.jpg That comparison made, I suspect that there are going to be quite a number of my future shots where I will share some SOOC JPEGs as the camera cooks them. Thanks for the interesting comparison. I do not remember the details, but I recently read in a review of a new camera, that the (finest setting) JPEGs were at least equal to the RAW images, sooc. It's fascinating. When in doubt, I run tests for image quality both on-screen and at 8x10" prints. Occasionally, I am quite surprised. Mort Linder Here is a SOOC JPEG from that shoot, no post at all. Not resized, or compressed beyond the original. I guess if brought down to typical veiwing size it would be quite acceptable. https://db.tt/9pEUyjhc -- Regards, Savageduck |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
A SOOC JPEG vs RAW Comparison
In article 2016050216435780324-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom, Savageduck
says... All the various Fuji oriented sites have gone on, and on at how good the JPEGs are straight out of the camera (SOOC) with the Fuji X-Series. I have been shooting RAW+JPEG, but up until this weekend I have not bothered to even look at the JPEGs. So when I did just that with my Triathlon bikers shots from Saturday I was quite surprised to see just how good the SOOC JPEGs were, and beyond a crop they did not need any adjustment, and could be shared as shot. Needless to say the RAW files needed all the help post could give them. So here is a side-by-side comparison of an unadjusted RAW and SOOC JPEG. https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1295663/FileChute/screenshot_79a.jpg That comparison made, I suspect that there are going to be quite a number of my future shots where I will share some SOOC JPEGs as the camera cooks them. Out of camera JPEGs have been very good in a number of cameras already for a while, which is why I always shoot RAW+JPEG because then I can choose whether to use the OOC JPEG or the post-processed RAW. -- Alfred Molon Olympus E-series DSLRs and micro 4/3 forum at http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/MyOlympus/ http://myolympus.org/ photo sharing site |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another SOOC JPEG | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 2 | April 23rd 16 03:48 AM |
Thoughts on SOOC | Savageduck[_3_] | Digital Photography | 98 | March 11th 16 04:55 PM |
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation | Paul D. Sullivan | Digital Photography | 14 | January 30th 07 07:34 PM |
Nikon D70 RAW converted to JPEG - jpeg file size 3MB ? 5 MB? | Amit | Digital Photography | 1 | March 16th 06 06:50 PM |
RAW vs JPEG comparison for D70 | paul | Digital SLR Cameras | 20 | January 19th 05 02:01 AM |