(Novembre, 27th) Picture of the Week

Hello,

The picture of the week, as often in b&w, here
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine.

Paris is a romantic town, and I'm very romantic.

Regards,

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel Rocha wrote:
The picture of the week, as often in b&w, here
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine.

Paris is a romantic town, and I'm very romantic.

UGGGHHH! What a mess!
High contrast crap at it's finest.

Lovingly yours,
-Annika

P.S. Is it just me or does the color seem to be just a wee bit off in
that one?

Daniel Rocha wrote:
Hello,

The picture of the week, as often in b&w, here
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine.

Paris is a romantic town, and I'm very romantic.

Regards,

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel,
This one leaves me cold. It doesn't have
your normal flare to the image. You are
not showing the passion of Paris. Nor
showing the romance of the city. Just
some passing art work on the back of
a bus. Now if you had two lovers in
an embrace under the heart...

Keep at it Daniel. You can do better. We've
seen that you can.



Draco


Getting even isn't good enough.

Draco a écrit :
This one leaves me cold. It doesn't have
your normal flare to the image. You are
not showing the passion of Paris.

It's not the goal !

Nor
showing the romance of the city. Just
some passing art work on the back of
a bus. Now if you had two lovers in
an embrace under the heart...

Right. Showing passion, love, can not be done
in different ways.I do not want to show it in
one way. I want to show an idea.

Keep at it Daniel. You can do better. We've
seen that you can.

For me better is not showing every time people
together, to show love. For me better is to show
it, in different ways.

For example another way to show it :
http://www.monochromatique.com/dansl...lesbois09.html

Thanks for your opinion, Draco.

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Draco wrote:
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Hello,

The picture of the week, as often in b&w, here
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine.

Paris is a romantic town, and I'm very romantic.

Regards,

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel,
This one leaves me cold. It doesn't have
your normal flare to the image.

Flair. He means "flair".

I get the message: Paris is romantic; coldly, calculatedly romantic,
like a glossy advert campaign.

I'd still like to see Daniel's photos at about a third or a half
increased long dimension; I always look to see what's there, and if it
is interesting I want to look closer. If I can't, I leave almost
immediately.

--
Frank ess

Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel, are you by any chance related to the National Geographic
photographer Sergio Brandt Rocha?

"William Graham" wrote in message
. ..

Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel, are you by any chance related to the National Geographic
photographer Sergio Brandt Rocha?


See:
http://seabed.nationalgeographic.com...ue_id=20060201

William Graham wrote:
Daniel, are you by any chance related to the National Geographic
photographer Sergio Brandt Rocha?

I kinda doubt it.

Frank ess wrote:
Draco wrote:
Daniel Rocha wrote:
Hello,

The picture of the week, as often in b&w, here
http://www.monochromatique.com/photosemaine.

Paris is a romantic town, and I'm very romantic.

Regards,

--
Daniel Rocha | Photographie
http://www.monochromatique.com

Daniel,
This one leaves me cold. It doesn't have
your normal flare to the image.

Flair. He means "flair".

I get the message: Paris is romantic; coldly, calculatedly romantic,
like a glossy advert campaign.

I'd still like to see Daniel's photos at about a third or a half
increased long dimension; I always look to see what's there, and if it
is interesting I want to look closer. If I can't, I leave almost
immediately.


Frank,
Ooops. Thanks for the correction. I see what
you are saying about Daniel's image. I guess
I'm too romantic to see it.


Draco


Getting even isn't good enough.

wrote:

Right. Showing passion, love, can not be done
in different ways.I do not want to show it in
one way. I want to show an idea.

Keep at it Daniel. You can do better. We've
seen that you can.

For me better is not showing every time people
together, to show love. For me better is to show
it, in different ways.

For example another way to show it :
http://www.monochromatique.com/dansl...lesbois09.html

Thanks for your opinion, Draco.



Great example of showing the lasting effects
of romance. Showing two souls intertwined in
the bark of a growing thing. Yes, this shows
love. Show the idea of passion. Show the idea
of love. The warmth. The strength. The ever lasting
committment of two to each other. No matter
how fleeting the moment.
The image of the back of the bus, motor carridge
or motorhome or what ever that thing was didn't
convay the passion of romance. The strength of
love. It was a nice piece of airbrush work that
the owner may have felt displayed something.
What, I'm not sure.

Daniel shoot what you have the need to shoot.
Don't let me or any one else sway you away from
your vision of photography.

Keep at it and never give up.

Draco


Getting even isn't good enough.