A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

overexposed K100D shot?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 27th 06, 05:16 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
m II
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 592
Default overexposed K100D shot?



http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


mike
  #2  
Old November 27th 06, 05:48 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
G.T.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 692
Default overexposed K100D shot?

m II wrote:


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


Ugly photo, ugly model, so who cares if it's over or underexposed?

Greg

--
"All my time I spent in heaven
Revelries of dance and wine
Waking to the sound of laughter
Up I'd rise and kiss the sky" - The Mekons
  #3  
Old November 27th 06, 09:30 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
mogh baba
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 37
Default overexposed K100D shot?

On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:48:56 -0800, "G.T."
wrote:

m II wrote:


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


Ugly photo, ugly model, so who cares if it's over or underexposed?




She is gorgeous, you have to wash your eyes.

M



Greg


  #4  
Old November 27th 06, 09:43 AM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Ron Hunter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,064
Default overexposed K100D shot?

mogh baba wrote:
On Sun, 26 Nov 2006 20:48:56 -0800, "G.T."
wrote:

m II wrote:

http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368

Ugly photo, ugly model, so who cares if it's over or underexposed?




She is gorgeous, you have to wash your eyes.

M


Greg


Obviously, different standards of beauty here. I am sure the
photographer considers her beautiful, even though I don't agree. I
suspect the lighting was supposed to set a mood, but missed, in my opinion.
  #5  
Old November 27th 06, 10:51 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 965
Default overexposed K100D shot?

Ron Hunter wrote:
[]
Obviously, different standards of beauty here. I am sure the
photographer considers her beautiful, even though I don't agree. I
suspect the lighting was supposed to set a mood, but missed, in my
opinion.


Looked like the head was stuck on after the photo was taken....

David


  #6  
Old November 27th 06, 02:02 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Bennie C'ra''mer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3
Default overexposed K100D shot?


"m II" wrote in message
newsEtah.19750$1U5.15868@edtnps90...


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368




EEEEEEWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW. Plastic tits.


  #7  
Old November 27th 06, 04:55 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Bill Funk
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,500
Default overexposed K100D shot?

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:16:20 GMT, m II wrote:



http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


mike


Go to the "Original" size, and look around.
If this is an example of what the K100D is capable of, I'd steer
clear.
--
Bill Funk
replace "g" with "a"
  #8  
Old November 27th 06, 05:30 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
Roy G
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 878
Default overexposed K100D shot?


"m II" wrote in message
newsEtah.19750$1U5.15868@edtnps90...


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


mike


A lot of rubbish has been spoken about this picture.

The exposure on the face is Ok.
The Body is a bit underexposed ( Too Dark), but that may be deliberate in
order to keep[ us looking at the face.

The actual pose is ever so excessively ordinary, "hand on hip, stick out
tits". The facial expression is dreadful, is it meant to be sexy, or is she
just ****ed off ? The head is straight on to the camera, the eyes are level,
the lighting is flat.

The red wall behind, way behind, is lit as brightly as the face. The whole
thing really looks like a picture of a red wall with a female obscuring part
of it.

2 out of 10.

She should really get someone, who knows what they are doing, to take her
next set of photos.

Roy G


  #9  
Old November 27th 06, 08:30 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
J. Clarke
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,690
Default overexposed K100D shot?

On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 16:30:51 +0000, Roy G wrote:

"m II" wrote in message
newsEtah.19750$1U5.15868@edtnps90...


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


mike


A lot of rubbish has been spoken about this picture.

The exposure on the face is Ok.
The Body is a bit underexposed ( Too Dark), but that may be deliberate in
order to keep[ us looking at the face.

The actual pose is ever so excessively ordinary, "hand on hip, stick out
tits". The facial expression is dreadful, is it meant to be sexy, or is she
just ****ed off ? The head is straight on to the camera, the eyes are level,
the lighting is flat.

The red wall behind, way behind, is lit as brightly as the face. The whole
thing really looks like a picture of a red wall with a female obscuring part
of it.

2 out of 10.

She should really get someone, who knows what they are doing, to take her
next set of photos.


Looking at the rest of the set there's one where here eyes are a not
unpleasant slightly silvery blue but in the rest they're a kind of dingy
gray with no detail to speak of in the irises. Was she wearing colored
contacts for some of them or is the white balance off somewhere?

Should get her hair done professionally just prior to the shoot and get
some makeup on those stretch marks as well.

--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)
  #10  
Old November 27th 06, 10:12 PM posted to rec.photo.equipment.35mm,rec.photo.digital,rec.photo.digital.slr-systems
Colin_D
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 337
Default overexposed K100D shot?

m II wrote:


http://www.pbase.com/image/65541368


mike

If you think that shot is overexposed, you aint seen nuthin, boy.

Colin D.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Canon A40 Overexposed Frank Digital Photography 4 December 20th 05 01:38 AM
problems scanning overexposed 35MM justareader Digital Photography 13 March 9th 05 10:46 PM
overexposed in macro Jason K. Lambrou Digital Photography 8 January 24th 05 11:16 PM
oops. Overexposed VC 160 Michael R. Lachance Medium Format Photography Equipment 8 September 28th 04 09:33 PM
Underexposed is Better Than Overexposed with 64T??? Dr. Slick Large Format Photography Equipment 13 May 16th 04 04:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.