4x6 printer...

Hi CNT,

The Printer Docks do hold the Kodak cameras, but can be used as a stand
alone printer. Just attach them to the computer and make prints. Also, the
newest 'KODAK Printer Dock' is Pictbridge enabled, so you can use other
makers cameras to make prints. Check it out on our site.

Ron Baird
Eastman Kodak Company


Well, I have direct experience with five of the 4x6 printers; they a

1. HP's
2. Epsons Picturemate
3. Sony's
4. Kodak
6. Canon's CP-330

The first two are ink-jet technology while the last three are dye-sub.
All
do a fairly good job, although I've found the Canon printers seem to print
a
little green. Part of the answer to your question will probably depend on
your requirements. The smallest printer (and only one that runs on
batteries) is the Canon CP-330 (they also make the CP-200/220 which is the
same size, but doesn't have the battery option). The lowest operating
cost
is the Epson (about $0.29 per print list and $0.26 if you shop around for
the supplies).

The cons for the printers a

Hi CNT,

The Printer Docks do hold the Kodak cameras, but can be used as a stand
alone printer. Just attach them to the computer and make prints. Also, the
newest 'KODAK Printer Dock' is Pictbridge enabled, so you can use other
makers cameras to make prints. Check it out on our site.

Ron Baird
Eastman Kodak Company


Well, I have direct experience with five of the 4x6 printers; they a

1. HP's
2. Epsons Picturemate
3. Sony's
4. Kodak
6. Canon's CP-330

The first two are ink-jet technology while the last three are dye-sub.
All
do a fairly good job, although I've found the Canon printers seem to print
a
little green. Part of the answer to your question will probably depend on
your requirements. The smallest printer (and only one that runs on
batteries) is the Canon CP-330 (they also make the CP-200/220 which is the
same size, but doesn't have the battery option). The lowest operating
cost
is the Epson (about $0.29 per print list and $0.26 if you shop around for
the supplies).

The cons for the printers a

FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases: http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, right, including the clear film protective
overcoat.................................




"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...

FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Yeah, right, including the clear film protective
overcoat.................................




"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...

FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

I have both and my dye-sub prints much better 4x6's then my photojet
printer. The dye-sub does put a clear coat on it and the inkjet does not.

"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...
FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

I have both and my dye-sub prints much better 4x6's then my photojet
printer. The dye-sub does put a clear coat on it and the inkjet does not.

"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...
FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

I get rather good prints with my portable H-P 375B, using H-P Premium Plus
paper. The effect at a conference or party, in showing pictures within minutes
of shooting them, is akin to the first Polaroid instant camera in 1948. My "big"
H-P
7960 does make somewhat better prints, especially richer blacks.
Morton

wrote:

I have both and my dye-sub prints much better 4x6's then my photojet
printer. The dye-sub does put a clear coat on it and the inkjet does not.

"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...
FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

I get rather good prints with my portable H-P 375B, using H-P Premium Plus
paper. The effect at a conference or party, in showing pictures within minutes
of shooting them, is akin to the first Polaroid instant camera in 1948. My "big"
H-P
7960 does make somewhat better prints, especially richer blacks.
Morton

wrote:

I have both and my dye-sub prints much better 4x6's then my photojet
printer. The dye-sub does put a clear coat on it and the inkjet does not.

"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...
FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--

My Dye Sub Has Blacks better than Ink Jets and better Color .




"mort" wrote in message
...
I get rather good prints with my portable H-P 375B, using H-P Premium Plus
paper. The effect at a conference or party, in showing pictures within
minutes
of shooting them, is akin to the first Polaroid instant camera in 1948. My
"big"
H-P
7960 does make somewhat better prints, especially richer blacks.
Morton

wrote:

I have both and my dye-sub prints much better 4x6's then my photojet
printer. The dye-sub does put a clear coat on it and the inkjet does
not.

"Dr. Joel M. Hoffman" wrote in message
...
FWIW, I've found on-line services to be so good it's hard to justify
getting a 4x6 printer. But if you do get one, the inkjets seem to
produce much better output than the dye-subs - though it's not what
you'd expect.

-Joel


--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Please feed the 35mm lens/digicam databases:
http://www.exc.com/photography

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--