If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Download AlbumFamiy software at http://www.albumsfamily.com to help
you With its Image Browser, you can manage your images as easily as you can imagine; its Image Viewer shows your images in the most advanced Virtual Album; the PhotoEdit and Photofun functions give you wide room to adjust your images and make all kinds of prints such as postcards, cards, stationery and so on; what's more, the Bundled Functions allow you to scan images and send images to your specified destination just by a single click. With AlbumFamily, You can establish the most beautiful albums for yourself, your family and your friends, you can produce your own style stationery on your desk. You will never find another application software which fits you so well and satisfy you so much! |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
wrote in message m... Download AlbumFamiy software at SNIP Cross-posted spam. Bart |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Mark the post as the beginning of the spam from China, the country with no respect for copyright, nor little else in the domain of intellectual rights. I would be surprised if they can be discouraged from spamming usenet. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Likely the same as spam from the US - the country with no respect for
anything other than expediency. "jjs" wrote in message ... Mark the post as the beginning of the spam from China, the country with no respect for copyright, nor little else in the domain of intellectual rights. I would be surprised if they can be discouraged from spamming usenet. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
On Fri, 28 May 2004 20:39:45 +0200, "Bart van der Wolf"
wrote: wrote in message om... Download AlbumFamiy software at SNIP Cross-posted spam. One of my pet peeves is "trial ware" that is called "share ware". Used to be, "share ware" was something you could try and then send a contribution if so inclined, while trial ware was... well... a tiral you either had a limited version, or a full version that would time out after so many days unless the proper S#, or activation code was entered which you got by paying money. I have no problem with either, but I wish they would use the old naming conventions. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Bart |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
In article ,
Roger Halstead wrote: One of my pet peeves is "trial ware" that is called "share ware". Used to be, "share ware" was something you could try and then send a contribution if so inclined, while trial ware was... well... a tiral you either had a limited version, or a full version that would time out after so many days unless the proper S#, or activation code was entered which you got by paying money. I have no problem with either, but I wish they would use the old naming conventions. Maybe its 'trial" ware only if you share it without paying for it in otherwords you get sued ;-) -- Baltimore & DC Large Format User Website http://members.verizon.net/~gregoryblank For best results expand this window at least 6" at 1152 x 768 resolution |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Agree with that ...
"Roger Halstead" wrote in message ... |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Tom Monego wrote:
Trying to find the name, he wrote a couple of articles in Yahoo's Epson Wide Format group stating that he was printing at 720ppi and 1440ppi. Scans 4x5's to 4000ppi (Aztek drum) and prints at 16x20 monochrome. He teaches at the New School in New York and tours with Cone Editions doing workshops. Been going through archives etc. trying to get the name. But he is questioning the status quo and backing up his theories with work. I find his work interesting and got me looking at prints at 240, 300, 360, and 720ppi. I personally saw a difference at 240 to 360ppi, 720 just didn't seem that much different and the file size got huge.But I'm working at 360ppi more now. Oh yes using an Epson 7600 with the pieziochrome inksets. Tom, Ive done experiments with different ppi prints, going up to 600ppi. see: http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/printer-ppi I've done blind tests of people sorting prints in order of sharpness. In good "office" or outdoor lighting almost everyone gets the sequence correct, choosing the 600 ppi print as sharpest. As light levels drop, it becomes more difficult. I need to present the statistics on the above page. Roger |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
scanning large format: to the limit (and beyond)
Ive done experiments with different ppi prints, going up to 600ppi. see: http://www.clarkvision.com/imagedetail/printer-ppi I've done blind tests of people sorting prints in order of sharpness. In good "office" or outdoor lighting almost everyone gets the sequence correct, choosing the 600 ppi print as sharpest. As light levels drop, it becomes more difficult. I need to present the statistics on the above page. Roger Pushing the standard accepted norm is interesting especially in conservative relms like large format photography and printing. As i said I saw a plateau at 360ppi but it could have been that I just didn't have the res in the scan to begin with. Tom |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|