A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Lens speed: Not always the best choice



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 11th 09, 03:16 AM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 31
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:20:27 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:

People buy fast lenses for 2 reasons:
-The want the speed to capture action.
-They want the shallow DOF afforded by such lenses.

For for the first reason, speed is not always the best choice.
Shooting at a higher ISO sometimes works out better than using a lens
wide open and once you determine that it does for a specific lens,
then there is generally no reason to shoot a specific subject at the
wider aperture. The benefits are better image quality (fewer image
aberrations), possibly more accurate focus and the potential to use a
much cheaper lens. The downside is noise and giving up shallow DOF.

Here is an example of a shot at 800 ISO with a lens wide open and 1600
ISO with the lens stopped down. Shutter speeds were the same, so you
aren't giving that up.

The trick is to determine which lenses fall into this category.

http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...08342/original


I thought all lenses worked better if stopped down... Maybe a high quality lens
at f2 could beat a crap lens at f8... but the quality lens at f8 would be even
better.

What camera did you use for those shots?

  #2  
Old July 11th 09, 04:25 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Paul Furman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,367
Default |GG| Lens speed: Not always the best choice

Rich wrote:
On Jul 10, 10:16 pm, wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:20:27 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:
People buy fast lenses for 2 reasons:
-The want the speed to capture action.
-They want the shallow DOF afforded by such lenses.
For for the first reason, speed is not always the best choice.
Shooting at a higher ISO sometimes works out better than using a lens
wide open and once you determine that it does for a specific lens,
then there is generally no reason to shoot a specific subject at the
wider aperture. The benefits are better image quality (fewer image
aberrations), possibly more accurate focus and the potential to use a
much cheaper lens. The downside is noise and giving up shallow DOF.
Here is an example of a shot at 800 ISO with a lens wide open and 1600
ISO with the lens stopped down. Shutter speeds were the same, so you
aren't giving that up.
The trick is to determine which lenses fall into this category.
http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...08342/original

I thought all lenses worked better if stopped down... Maybe a high quality lens
at f2 could beat a crap lens at f8... but the quality lens at f8 would be even
better.


A lens has to be pretty awful not to work well centrally at f8.0. But
some lenses are amazing wide open. Nikon's 14-24mm f2.8. Check out
the output from an Olympus 35-100mm f2.0, it's pretty amazing.
What camera did you use for those shots?


Panasonic G1.


What's the f/2 lens?

--
Paul Furman
www.edgehill.net
www.baynatives.com

all google groups messages filtered due to spam
  #3  
Old July 11th 09, 05:23 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Alan Browne
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,640
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:20:27 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:

People buy fast lenses for 2 reasons:
-The want the speed to capture action.
-They want the shallow DOF afforded by such lenses.

For for the first reason, speed is not always the best choice.
Shooting at a higher ISO sometimes works out better than using a lens
wide open and once you determine that it does for a specific lens,
then there is generally no reason to shoot a specific subject at the
wider aperture. The benefits are better image quality (fewer image
aberrations), possibly more accurate focus and the potential to use a
much cheaper lens. The downside is noise and giving up shallow DOF.

Here is an example of a shot at 800 ISO with a lens wide open and 1600
ISO with the lens stopped down. Shutter speeds were the same, so you
aren't giving that up.

The trick is to determine which lenses fall into this category.

http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...08342/original

I thought all lenses worked better if stopped down.


Generally _most_ lenses are sharpset stopped down 2 - 3 stops from wide
open. Most diffract to a softer image beyond f/11, noticeably so beyond
f/16 or so - though in most common print sizes this not usually noticeable.

Likewise, the softer wide open shots only show as soft at 8x12" or so
(for a 35mm cropped sensor camera)
  #4  
Old July 11th 09, 07:30 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Praying They Educate Themselves
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

On Sat, 11 Jul 2009 12:23:51 -0400, Alan Browne
wrote:

wrote:
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 08:20:27 -0700 (PDT), RichA wrote:

People buy fast lenses for 2 reasons:
-The want the speed to capture action.
-They want the shallow DOF afforded by such lenses.

For for the first reason, speed is not always the best choice.
Shooting at a higher ISO sometimes works out better than using a lens
wide open and once you determine that it does for a specific lens,
then there is generally no reason to shoot a specific subject at the
wider aperture. The benefits are better image quality (fewer image
aberrations), possibly more accurate focus and the potential to use a
much cheaper lens. The downside is noise and giving up shallow DOF.

Here is an example of a shot at 800 ISO with a lens wide open and 1600
ISO with the lens stopped down. Shutter speeds were the same, so you
aren't giving that up.

The trick is to determine which lenses fall into this category.

http://www.pbase.com/andersonrm/imag...08342/original


I thought all lenses worked better if stopped down.


Generally _most_ lenses are sharpset stopped down 2 - 3 stops from wide
open. Most diffract to a softer image beyond f/11, noticeably so beyond
f/16 or so - though in most common print sizes this not usually noticeable.

Likewise, the softer wide open shots only show as soft at 8x12" or so
(for a 35mm cropped sensor camera)


This is only true for all poorly figured DSLR glass. The same cannot be
said for true diffraction-limited glass (the most precise lens polishing
that money can buy), as is found in nearly all higher-quality P&S cameras.

Simple test: If you open up your aperture wider at any point and the image
gets worse, that is NOT diffraction-limited optics. Meaning, it's just
poorly figured glass. DSLR buyers are so easily fooled. They still live by
that oft-disproved saying "you get what you pay for". The lens and camera
makers more than happy to take advantage of their naïveté and ignorance.


  #5  
Old July 11th 09, 07:58 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Ray Fischer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,136
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

Praying They Don't Educate Themselves wrote:
Alan Browne
Likewise, the softer wide open shots only show as soft at 8x12" or so
(for a 35mm cropped sensor camera)


This is only true for all poorly figured DSLR glass. The same cannot be
said for true diffraction-limited glass (the most precise lens polishing
that money can buy), as is found in nearly all higher-quality P&S cameras.


LOL!

Simple test:


If somebody claims that a $400 camera has optics that are as good as
those in a $2000 lens then they are a liar or a crackpot.

--
Ray Fischer


  #6  
Old July 11th 09, 08:06 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Paul Furman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 7,367
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

Themselves wrote:
...true diffraction-limited glass (the most precise lens polishing
that money can buy), as is found in nearly all higher-quality P&S cameras.


Specific examples... ?
  #8  
Old July 11th 09, 08:47 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Chris Malcolm[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,142
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Ray Fischer wrote:
Praying They Don't Educate Themselves wrote:
Alan Browne
Likewise, the softer wide open shots only show as soft at 8x12" or so
(for a 35mm cropped sensor camera)


This is only true for all poorly figured DSLR glass. The same cannot be
said for true diffraction-limited glass (the most precise lens polishing
that money can buy), as is found in nearly all higher-quality P&S cameras.


LOL!


Simple test:


If somebody claims that a $400 camera has optics that are as good as
those in a $2000 lens then they are a liar or a crackpot.


If the optical design playing field was level. Which it most certainly
isn't in this case.

Cost depends on the optical problems the lens has to solve. A DSLR
lens has to deliver its intended quality while leaving enough room
between sensor and rear lens element to accomodate the mirror. That
adds a lot to the cost of lenses of shorter focal lengths.

--
Chris Malcolm
  #10  
Old July 11th 09, 08:59 PM posted to rec.photo.digital.slr-systems,rec.photo.digital
Ray Fischer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,136
Default Lens speed: Not always the best choice

Chris Malcolm wrote:
In rec.photo.digital.slr-systems Ray Fischer wrote:
Praying They Don't Educate Themselves wrote:
Alan Browne
Likewise, the softer wide open shots only show as soft at 8x12" or so
(for a 35mm cropped sensor camera)

This is only true for all poorly figured DSLR glass. The same cannot be
said for true diffraction-limited glass (the most precise lens polishing
that money can buy), as is found in nearly all higher-quality P&S cameras.


LOL!


Simple test:


If somebody claims that a $400 camera has optics that are as good as
those in a $2000 lens then they are a liar or a crackpot.


If the optical design playing field was level. Which it most certainly
isn't in this case.

Cost depends on the optical problems the lens has to solve. A DSLR
lens has to deliver its intended quality while leaving enough room
between sensor and rear lens element to accomodate the mirror.


And if you have a tiny sensor then you certainly can compromise the
lens quality to match the sensor's abilities.

--
Ray Fischer


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens speed: Not always the best choice Gary Edstrom Digital SLR Cameras 1 July 12th 09 11:33 PM
Lens speed: Not always the best choice David J Taylor[_11_] Digital Photography 1 July 10th 09 08:46 PM
How does choice of developer affect film speed? [email protected] In The Darkroom 18 February 26th 05 01:22 AM
Shutter Speed help...choice of Cameras Marty H Digital Photography 9 September 22nd 04 02:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.