If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#211
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 19:59:53 -0000, Shadow wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:41:43 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: And you seem to forget what you wrote yourself. One minute you're upset that David believes in copyright, now you're making out you believe in it too. BD believes the RIAA are *good guys* , not the groups/singers. Because the RIAA are stinking rich, they *MUST* be good, even if the groups/singers sink in debt. OTOH BD has no problem with posting copyrighted PERSONAL media which he obtained through email from people that trusted him and asked him to keep it PRIVATE. If you can't see the difference, you lack a moral compass. One of those just isn't copyright. Copyright is to do with money, not privacy. FYI I fart in the general direction of the RIAA and BD's idea of morals. Dog save HHI, and all the other people that work hard to make good music available for others. I just get anything I can for free and don't give a **** about paying for anything I don't have to. |
#212
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On 14/12/2019 22:16, Commander Kinsey wrote:
BD has no problem with posting copyrighted PERSONAL media which he obtained through email from people that trusted him and asked him to keep it PRIVATE. Do you think Shadow has the balls to back up what he claims? Maybe he'll give YOU a Message ID with evidence - he certainly won't give it to me. I *KNOW* he lies in every post! |
#213
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On 14/12/2019 22:14, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:05:29 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:53:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:39:42 -0000, Diesel wrote: Davids only religion is the bottle. Don't kid yourself. There's nothing in the book people like him like to thump that supports in any way what he admitted to doing. Why do you think there's something wrong with alcohol? ****Among all addictive drugs, it's the only one that hurts OTHER PEOPLE more than it hurts the addict. ****Look it up. Or read BD's posts. I can hurt people without any drugs.* It's the person that hurts, not the drugs. Spot on. Thank you for not trying to hurt me. :-) |
#214
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 22:31:19 -0000, David wrote:
On 14/12/2019 22:14, Commander Kinsey wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:05:29 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:53:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:39:42 -0000, Diesel wrote: Davids only religion is the bottle. Don't kid yourself. There's nothing in the book people like him like to thump that supports in any way what he admitted to doing. Why do you think there's something wrong with alcohol? Among all addictive drugs, it's the only one that hurts OTHER PEOPLE more than it hurts the addict. Look it up. Or read BD's posts. I can hurt people without any drugs. It's the person that hurts, not the drugs. Spot on. Thank you for not trying to hurt me. :-) I have a picture of your boat. I will find you and attack you with my canoe. My canoe has killed before - a red deer stag which tried to jump in front of my car while I was doing 90mph with the canoe on my roof. |
#215
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 22:29:09 -0000, David wrote:
On 14/12/2019 22:16, Commander Kinsey wrote: BD has no problem with posting copyrighted PERSONAL media which he obtained through email from people that trusted him and asked him to keep it PRIVATE. Do you think Shadow has the balls to back up what he claims? Maybe he'll give YOU a Message ID with evidence - he certainly won't give it to me. I *KNOW* he lies in every post! If somebody gives someone a picture, they can't guarantee it won't get passed along. That's just silly. You need to tell shadow to look up the word "gossip" in the dictionary. |
#216
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
"Commander Kinsey"
newsp.0cswvtebwdg98l@glass Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:41:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:39:41 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0cph66a0wdg98l@glass Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:31:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:55:42 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0clbvmglwdg98l@glass Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:24:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:18:16 -0000, Diesel wrote: [snip] I didn't say anything about cost. Free or otherwise... You said "no subscription", that means free. Or were you doing word games? That doesn't mean free. That just means there's no recurring cost in the financial sense. There is in drive space consumption, but, hey, nothings really free. No, I wasn't playing word games. It sounded like you were avoiding paying, and since you made torrents.... You seem to have the same tendency for writing bull**** as David Brooks does. I made torrents while I was developing software intended to make use of the torrent file itself, yes. That does NOT mean I created torrents with copyrighted material and passed them around, as you clearly implied with your statement. HHI copied mp3s so we could all enjoy them. You're in HHI. Are you sure you have eleven years experience in I.T? The reason I ask is because HHI doesn't copy mp3s. HHI takes an original cd, uses EAC to rip it using secure mode rip. Once that's finished, the resulting .wav files which were created by EAC are passed along to LAME v3.90.3 for the encoding process. The original .wav files are then deleted to recover drive space. The newly created mp3s are properly named and tagged, the .nfo is created and the 'release' is finished. Duplicates of said release are made for archival purposes. They are pushed to the other pieces of the network which consists of HHI. From there, it's sent to private servers. And that's as specific with the process as i'm going to get with you. Various protection is in place to prevent any data from being released to unauthorized individuals in the unlikely event of a security breach remotely, or a localized one via some kind of raid. In other words, raiding a member, taking all of his/her gear and processing it will provide you nothing of value to be used against the individual or the group itself. Likewise if you somehow managed to locate and breach (atleast you thought you did) one of our network entry points. You'd quickly be discovered and at no time would you have any 'real' access to anything of value. OTH, I do hope you took necessary precautions to protect yourself from, heh, unwanted, large amounts of bandwidth capable retaliation, full on, blackhat style. We aren't called Happy Hacker Industries for ****s and giggles. G Half the world copies music for free. And you helped us all out with your HHI torrents. If you're thankful for the service we provide at great cost, please assist us by telling others about the evils of the RIAA and encourage them to directly support the artists they enjoy. -- If you jog in a jogging suit, lounge in lounging pyjamas, and smoke in a smoking jacket, why would anyone want to wear a windbreaker? |
#217
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
"Commander Kinsey"
newsp.0csxfbs0wdg98l@glass Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:53:25 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: You might want to consider refreshing your headers and/or changing usenet providers. I see more than a single post present and more than one copy of the picture you've now had the pleasure of viewing. I use altopia, which has excellent retention and I can get months even years of binaries from every other group. The only possibility is I've been in that group before (it must have been months ago as I can't remember it), and deleted what was there at the time. But there should be stuff form the last few months at least. Yet there isn't. I very much doubt my newsserver somehow managed to lose every single post except the very one you told me about. I'm still able to pull a total of seven headers from es for that newsgroup. Seven individual posts I can bring up. Message-ID: mNB4774H Injection-Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 04:18:09 -0000 (UTC) That's the other one that you claimed doesn't exist. G it's from last year. five others besides my two remain. If you can't see them, you don't have the good retention you thought you did. I.T. for eleven years you claimed? Yet, you know nothing of the hpavc scenes; yet seem to be quite pleased with being on the receiving end of some of the fruits of the scenes labor. Not only are you a rather generic troll, you're a bit more than a slight ****wit bull****ter, too. Why the **** would you think working in IT would mean I'd be familiar with silly little geek groups in another country? You're like a bunch of little teenagers hacking into things and ****ing about for a laugh. You see, in my work I dealt with adults. I wasn't aware hpavc was country specific...Whatever your eleven years experience actually is, it's NOT what I'd consider I.T to be, based on your posts...You seem to be seriously lacking in even basic information for the experience you claimed to have in the field of I.T. -- Baby robins eat 14 feet of worms a day. |
#218
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
"Commander Kinsey"
newsp.0csw4et5wdg98l@glass Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:46:52 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: It's the reason the rich get rich, by haggling. If you pay the price quoted, you get poor. When I take my car to the garage, I don't accept the £400 bill. I reject what they want to do, tell them what I want done, and provide the parts for them, that way they can't rip me off with markup. They get the labour fee and nothing else. Hey, that's fine with me. So long as you understand that you'll pay me for doing exactly what YOU told me to do, whether it works or not. On the other hand, if you let me diagnose it and perform the fix I recommended, I'm responsible for the results. If you decide to diagnose it and you're wrong, you're still going to pay me for my time even if it's worse off than it was before you brought it to me. And if you want it fixed right, like it should have been the first time, you're going to pay me *again* to do it. You're better off letting me take a look at it, I'm the expert here. If you (a) knew what you were doing and (b) had the knowledge/tools/equipment to fix it yourself, you wouldn't have brought it to me. And, if I used your parts, I don't have any warranty on them or my labor. If the part is some cheap junk and doesn't last, that's your problem. I installed it, as per your request, you provided it. Done deal. But, if you want to pay me twice to **** it up as you wanted and then fix it, like it should be, I'm okay with that. I'll try to discourage you from being so dumb about it, but I won't force you not to. I like money well enough. Especially money you're going to be giving me for being stupid. Sure. And if you bring me the outright, totally wrong ****ing part to install, it's billable time while you come and get this part and bring me the right one, it sure the **** is. I've got other **** to be doing and don't wanna be wasting time with this dumb **** you're doing to try and save a dollar. And your equipment, that you brought me, that you told me to only use your parts on is taking up space in my building that could be making me money. You will pay me for that time. The time I'm wasting with your machine, because you brought me the wrong ****ing part for it the first time around. Go cheap, take shortcuts like you do, you pay more in the long run. You're better off doing it right the first time. And I'll be damned if i'll take on any client who wants to play 'lets make a deal about what you're not going to charge me' in person or over the phone. I don't like turning down jobs, but, if you call or I meet you in person and I give you my rates and/or an estimate and you come back at me with half price per hour or some crazy nonsense, you are welcome to call and/or speak with one of my competitors. Ah, so you only take on the gullible people that will just give you the inflated price you make up. You're a ****ing cowboy. My price is fair. I'm not the cheapest here nor the most expensive. I know what I'm worth and I charge accordingly. You're a liar, then. I've told you, many times, HHI does NOT release torrents of any kind to any place. No group that I know of who's 'scene' level does. There's another system in place for the transportation to the masses. And, I wasted the time more than once previously explaining that to you, as well. I won't do so again. There's HHI stuff on piratebay. Yep, and many other places. HHI can't take any credit for that though, it's all the work of the distro groups. HHI is fortunate to be in their good graces. That's the transportation system I mentioned ...*shrug*. Seriously, how can you not know any of this and have eleven years experience in I.T? I don't understand that. For free. That's the idea. And you linked to it I did what? you personally sent the link for David to look at. I've posted many links for david to look at over the years. I've had the misfortune of knowing him for a long time now. The links are available with a simple google search. I just shared some results with him. That's piracy and I like it. Rapists like sex, they get sex for free, they like it. I understand your point but I'd wager that Commander Kinsey has never raped anyone .... .... nor written malicious code designed to cause harm. David, switch hands and find another horse. There isn't even dust left. the malicious code you whine about is twenty years old. Yeah yeah, you're a different person now, we've heard it all before. Ayep. If you can find some malicious code I wrote that's newer than irok, feel free to share it or a link pointing to it. Otherwise, deal with the fact that I'm not the same person I was then. I've changed for what I believe to be the better, whether you believe it or not. -- Should crematoriums give discounts for burn victims? |
#219
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 22:14:51 -0000, "Commander Kinsey"
wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 20:05:29 -0000, Shadow wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:53:25 -0000, "Commander Kinsey" wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:39:42 -0000, Diesel wrote: Davids only religion is the bottle. Don't kid yourself. There's nothing in the book people like him like to thump that supports in any way what he admitted to doing. Why do you think there's something wrong with alcohol? Among all addictive drugs, it's the only one that hurts OTHER PEOPLE more than it hurts the addict. Look it up. Or read BD's posts. I can hurt people without any drugs. It's the person that hurts, not the drugs. I'm happy to know you have a post grad in Medicine, as I do. I thought you were only a Doctor in IT. My references must be different to yours. What do you practice, Chinese medicine? []'s -- Don't be evil - Google 2004 We have a new policy - Google 2012 |
#220
|
|||
|
|||
Resurrecting a jpeg?
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 08:02:50 -0000, Diesel wrote:
"Commander Kinsey" newsp.0cswvtebwdg98l@glass Sat, 14 Dec 2019 18:41:43 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:39:41 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0cph66a0wdg98l@glass Thu, 12 Dec 2019 22:31:44 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 05:55:42 -0000, Diesel wrote: "Commander Kinsey" newsp.0clbvmglwdg98l@glass Tue, 10 Dec 2019 16:24:48 GMT in alt.computer.workshop, wrote: On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 09:18:16 -0000, Diesel wrote: [snip] I didn't say anything about cost. Free or otherwise... You said "no subscription", that means free. Or were you doing word games? That doesn't mean free. That just means there's no recurring cost in the financial sense. There is in drive space consumption, but, hey, nothings really free. No, I wasn't playing word games. It sounded like you were avoiding paying, and since you made torrents.... You seem to have the same tendency for writing bull**** as David Brooks does. I made torrents while I was developing software intended to make use of the torrent file itself, yes. That does NOT mean I created torrents with copyrighted material and passed them around, as you clearly implied with your statement. HHI copied mp3s so we could all enjoy them. You're in HHI. Are you sure you have eleven years experience in I.T? The reason I ask is because HHI doesn't copy mp3s. HHI takes an original cd, uses EAC to rip it using secure mode rip. Once that's finished, the resulting .wav files which were created by EAC are passed along to LAME v3.90.3 for the encoding process. The original .wav files are then deleted to recover drive space. The newly created mp3s are properly named and tagged, the .nfo is created and the 'release' is finished. Duplicates of said release are made for archival purposes. They are pushed to the other pieces of the network which consists of HHI. From there, it's sent to private servers. So you took a CD, ripped it to make mp3s (illegally - not that I care, I do it myself, but at least I admit to it), then passed it about, then you complain because it got out further than you would have liked. And that's as specific with the process as i'm going to get with you. Hiding something are you? Various protection is in place to prevent any data from being released to unauthorized individuals in the unlikely event of a security breach remotely, or a localized one via some kind of raid. Funny how anyone can get all the HHI stuff on Piratebay.... In other words, raiding a member, taking all of his/her gear and processing it will provide you nothing of value to be used against the individual or the group itself. Likewise if you somehow managed to locate and breach (atleast you thought you did) one of our network entry points. You'd quickly be discovered and at no time would you have any 'real' access to anything of value. OTH, I do hope you took necessary precautions to protect yourself from, heh, unwanted, large amounts of bandwidth capable retaliation, full on, blackhat style. We aren't called Happy Hacker Industries for ****s and giggles. G No, you're hardened criminals who take revenge on people for a laugh, you're no better than gun-toting arseholes that shoot people for kicks. Oh wait, you ARE one of those! You belong to a rifle club! You're a ****ing murderer that belongs in the wild west. Do grow up and join modern society. Half the world copies music for free. And you helped us all out with your HHI torrents. If you're thankful for the service we provide at great cost, please assist us by telling others about the evils of the RIAA and encourage them to directly support the artists they enjoy. I don't support the RIAA or the artists. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
JPEG 9 new lossless JPEG standard | Alfred Molon[_4_] | Digital Photography | 26 | February 13th 13 12:45 PM |
jpeg and jpeg 2000 | Conrad | Digital Photography | 71 | February 3rd 07 11:04 PM |
Better JPEG program - minimized JPEG degredation | Paul D. Sullivan | Digital Photography | 14 | January 30th 07 07:34 PM |
RAW vs. jpeg | Conrad | Digital Photography | 9 | September 30th 06 02:01 PM |
Nikon D70 RAW converted to JPEG - jpeg file size 3MB ? 5 MB? | Amit | Digital Photography | 1 | March 16th 06 06:50 PM |