If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read
many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. Thanks in advance for your help. Best, Sandy |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005, at 08:15:09 [GMT GMT] (19:15:09 Friday, 30 December
2005 where I live) "Sandy Bloom, Ph.D." wrote: I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. Every review, bar none, that I have read about this camera mentions noise, noise, noise. That put me off it, ended with a Canon Powershot A620 for carrying around, does a great job. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
I have made over 2000 photos with my FZ30 and I am happy with it. I upgraded
from FZ20. I did a lot of research, printed a few of FZ30 photos and only then I decided to get one. I think knew very well what to expect. I often do quite large prints and noise was never an issue. Well, almost. Under very bad light, the Lumix does indeed produce noise - but I still have to see a compact camera which does not. When I need to enlarge pictures taken under low light, that is, maximum 10% of all, I use NeatImage or NoiseNinja and that does it. The FZ30 is lightweight but sturdy, has superb handling like a professional SLR and, above all, the Leica lens is outstanding. Whatever opinion you read, no one would even try to hint at some problems with lens and picture quality. I would never buy a superzoom without image stabilizer and the FZ30 has an excellent one. Yes, there is some noise but I believe not less or more than in all other compact cameras using small chips. Unless you intend to do extreme enlargements, noise is really not an issue. Generally, noise is a very favoured theme of many reviewers. They should focus more on the lens qualities in different models - this is where gaping differences exist, not in noise levels. I believe the RAW capabilities tipped the scale in favour of FZ30. When you really want a superb picture, shoot RAW and do your postprocessing in the Photoshop RAW converter. No noise. Regards, Pavel "Sandy Bloom, Ph.D." píše v diskusním příspěvku ... I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. Thanks in advance for your help. Best, Sandy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
Sandy Bloom, Ph.D. wrote:
I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. You'll get better image quality with a DSLR: more dynamic range and much better low-light performance. But, you give up some things like pre- exposure histogram and being able to frame using that big LCD. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. The few reports I've seen from owners have been positive. Serious photographers are not buying this camera, so we're hearing from people who can tolerate its limitations. It's a trade-off. Paul Allen |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
"Paul Allen" "paul dot l dot allen at comcast dot net" wrote in message ... Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? I read them at dpreview.com. What do you think? Thanks, Sandy Sandy Bloom, Ph.D. wrote: I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. You'll get better image quality with a DSLR: more dynamic range and much better low-light performance. But, you give up some things like pre- exposure histogram and being able to frame using that big LCD. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. The few reports I've seen from owners have been positive. Serious photographers are not buying this camera, so we're hearing from people who can tolerate its limitations. It's a trade-off. Paul Allen |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
The reviews were by users I believe.
Sandy "Sandy Bloom, Ph.D." wrote in message ... "Paul Allen" "paul dot l dot allen at comcast dot net" wrote in message ... Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? I read them at dpreview.com. What do you think? Thanks, Sandy Sandy Bloom, Ph.D. wrote: I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. You'll get better image quality with a DSLR: more dynamic range and much better low-light performance. But, you give up some things like pre- exposure histogram and being able to frame using that big LCD. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. The few reports I've seen from owners have been positive. Serious photographers are not buying this camera, so we're hearing from people who can tolerate its limitations. It's a trade-off. Paul Allen |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
I love it. I have no issues with the image quality or the noise. Yes, there
is noise, but the amount is not a problem for me. You can see my gallery of images at: http://www.sonic.net/keesha At the bottom of the large images it tells you what camera. If it doesn't say, then it is from a very old one or from a film scan. Most of the images are from the Panasonic FZ20 and the FZ30. R |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
Maybe true. But, then who wants to carry all of the lenes around and worry
about dirt and dust getting on the sensor when you change them. Not to mention all of the wasted time switching lenses because you will never have the one you need on the camera at the time you want to take a picture. I went from the Canon 20D to the Panasonic FZ20. It was the best move I ever made. I hated the 20D not only for the reasons laid out above but because Canon sucks at support. I very much enjoy taking pictures with the Panasonic cameras. The Canon on the other hand I hated, it was too heavy and too much trouble as well. I never had it with me when I needed to take a picture so I didn't take pictures. The Panasonics go with me every where. The Panasonics have great lenses, great zoom level and you can do much better then Leica. R "Paul Allen" "paul dot l dot allen at comcast dot net" wrote in message ... Sandy Bloom, Ph.D. wrote: I'd appreciate hearing what you folks think of this camera. I have read many good reviews along with some very critical ones about image quality and noise. I was considering a DSLR, but the price and features of this camera have caused me to rethink my plan. You'll get better image quality with a DSLR: more dynamic range and much better low-light performance. But, you give up some things like pre- exposure histogram and being able to frame using that big LCD. Some suggested that the quality control of this camera's production may be quite variable. Random Usenet posters, or serious reviewers? Do you have any links? With your help. my brother-in-law bought the Z5, and he is very happy with it. The few reports I've seen from owners have been positive. Serious photographers are not buying this camera, so we're hearing from people who can tolerate its limitations. It's a trade-off. Paul Allen |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:59:41 +0100, "P" wrote Re
Panasonic DMC-FZ30: I have made over 2000 photos with my FZ30 and I am happy with it. I upgraded from FZ20. Can you tell us what you prefer about the FZ30 over the FZ20? I would be interested. -- To email me directly, remove CLUTTER. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Panasonic DMC-FZ30
Vic Dura wrote:
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:59:41 +0100, "P" wrote Re Panasonic DMC-FZ30: I have made over 2000 photos with my FZ30 and I am happy with it. I upgraded from FZ20. Can you tell us what you prefer about the FZ30 over the FZ20? I would be interested. Here's the list of advantages I put together a while back: It has a RAW mode. It boots in 1 second versus 5 because the lens doesn't extend. It has a manual zoom ring in addition to the focus ring. Viewfinder and LCD have 1.4x the resolution Tripod mounting hole is inline with the lens. LCD gains up in low light. Separate control dials for shutter, aperture. VGA-quality 30fps movie mode. 55mm filter threads, no adapter needed. Battery and memory card can be changed while camera is on a tripod. (The FZ20's battery/memory door looks like a tripod head would block it.) Not all of those are killer differences, but the package is really attractive. For balance, here's my list of cons: Only slightly better image quality than the FZ20 after dealing with noise. Effective focal length is slightly shorter. Heavier and larger by a little bit. Macro slightly less capable than the FZ20. Some CA at the wide end, some distortion, relative to the FZ20. IS not quite as effective due to the higher resolution. I don't own the camera and have simply dredged this stuff out of reviews. Some of this stuff might even be wrong. I'd be interested in hearing from owners of the FZ30 about which of these things are actually important. Paul Allen |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Panasonic FZ30 With 2GB SD Card? | Nemo Oudeheis | Digital ZLR Cameras | 8 | February 25th 06 02:28 AM |
Panasonic FZ30 With an Olympus WCON 7 Adapter? | Nemo Oudeheis | Digital ZLR Cameras | 4 | December 30th 05 07:35 PM |
Pop Photo HAMMERS Panasonic FZ30 over noise | Rich | Digital Photography | 28 | December 21st 05 07:56 AM |
pentax *ist or panasonic fz30 | corks | Digital ZLR Cameras | 7 | November 18th 05 08:25 AM |
Panasonic FZ30 | Bill Again | Digital ZLR Cameras | 0 | July 28th 05 11:46 PM |