A Photography forum. PhotoBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » PhotoBanter.com forum » Digital Photography » Digital Photography
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Digital camera specs



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 3rd 05, 10:45 AM
Eugel Yeo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Digital camera specs

Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?
Just curious...

- Eugel


  #2  
Old January 3rd 05, 11:44 AM
Joseph Meehan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eugel Yeo wrote:
Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better
camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better
indicator of image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera
manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often
compare megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different
cameras within a specific budget range?
Just curious...

- Eugel


Well in fact both sensor size and the number of pixels and the type and
design of the sensor are all important as are other factors. However that is
not what is important to the marketing team. They use whatever is easy to
sell. Pixels are easy to understand (more is better) and therefore can be
sold without explication.

--
Joseph Meehan

26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math


  #3  
Old January 3rd 05, 11:44 AM
Joseph Meehan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Eugel Yeo wrote:
Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better
camera" is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better
indicator of image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera
manufacturers advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often
compare megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different
cameras within a specific budget range?
Just curious...

- Eugel


Well in fact both sensor size and the number of pixels and the type and
design of the sensor are all important as are other factors. However that is
not what is important to the marketing team. They use whatever is easy to
sell. Pixels are easy to understand (more is better) and therefore can be
sold without explication.

--
Joseph Meehan

26 + 6 = 1 It's Irish Math


  #4  
Old January 3rd 05, 01:18 PM
Harvey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eugel Yeo" wrote in message
...
Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better

camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera

manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often

compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?
Just curious...

- Eugel


As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed
like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring
sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing
their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade
education.


  #5  
Old January 3rd 05, 01:18 PM
Harvey
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Eugel Yeo" wrote in message
...
Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better

camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera

manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often

compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?
Just curious...

- Eugel


As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others followed
like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better totalling ignoring
sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The manufacturers are gearing
their sales pitches to the AVI (Average Village Idiot) with an eighth grade
education.


  #6  
Old January 3rd 05, 03:57 PM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harvey wrote:
[]
As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others
followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better
totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The
manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average
Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education.


Much more fun if they labelled the cameras:

- cheap and nasty

- entry level, don't expect much

- mid price, we don't make too much profit from this but we sell a lot

- expensive for those idiots who have more money than sense

David


  #7  
Old January 3rd 05, 03:57 PM
David J Taylor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Harvey wrote:
[]
As soon as one manufacturer started selling megapixels the others
followed like lemmings. The public thinks the more the better
totalling ignoring sensor size, lens quality, build quality etc. The
manufacturers are gearing their sales pitches to the AVI (Average
Village Idiot) with an eighth grade education.


Much more fun if they labelled the cameras:

- cheap and nasty

- entry level, don't expect much

- mid price, we don't make too much profit from this but we sell a lot

- expensive for those idiots who have more money than sense

David


  #8  
Old January 3rd 05, 08:22 PM
Ken Oaf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:

Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?


The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens.


  #9  
Old January 3rd 05, 08:22 PM
Ken Oaf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:

Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?


The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens.


  #10  
Old January 3rd 05, 08:22 PM
Ken Oaf
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Mon, 3 Jan 2005 18:45:36 +0800, "Eugel Yeo" wrote:

Happy 2005!
I understand from various posts that "more megapixels equals better camera"
is more marketing than fact, and that sensor size is a better indicator of
image quality.
Reading through camera specifications, though, why dont camera manufacturers
advertise their sensor sizes?
Even camera reviewers dont compare sensor sizes, whereas they often compare
megapixels.
Wouldnt sensor size be a critical factor in considering different cameras
within a specific budget range?


The most important thing IMHO is the quality of the lens.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
once agin: medium vs. digital Steve Lefevre Medium Format Photography Equipment 39 November 23rd 04 12:49 AM
Digital zoom camera & lots of selection questions Lou Digital Photography 5 November 12th 04 12:43 AM
What was wrong with film? George Medium Format Photography Equipment 192 March 4th 04 02:44 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras thatuse film? Michael Weinstein, M.D. In The Darkroom 13 January 24th 04 09:51 PM
Which is better? digital cameras or older crappy cameras that use film? [email protected] Film & Labs 20 January 24th 04 09:51 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 PhotoBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.