"pioe[rmv]" wrote:
Tony Spadaro wrote:
I'd be incluned to go with a 50 f1.8 and the 70-200 f4 or even the f2.8
IS.
The Canon EF 50mm F/1.8 is inferior in build quality as well as in
performance to the 1.4 USM as well as the former version which had a
distance scale and metal mount.
I have tested both extensively, and have found that the 50mm 1.8 is
not a top-class lens,
Of course it's a "top-class" lens: it performs better than any Canon lens
with a shorter focal length*. Other than the 50/1.4, it's the best
normal-to-wide lens Canon makes.
Pretty flipping amazing for _any_ lens, let alone a $79.95 wonder (including
tax and shipping!).
*:
http://www.ocf.berkeley.edu/~ashon/photo/comparo6.htm
even if it is cheap. The plastic lens mount
excludes as a long-term investment.
Of course it's not a long-term investment: it's a $79.95 throwaway lens you
buy if you don't know if you would really use the 50/1.4 all that much.
David J. Littleboy
Tokyo, Japan