On 2018-01-08 09:14:36 +0000, Eric Stevens said:
On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 07:57:42 +0100, android wrote:
On 2018-01-08 03:00:46 +0000, Eric Stevens said:
On Sat, 23 Dec 2017 16:22:23 +0100, android wrote:
On 2017-12-23 15:04:31 +0000, android said:
On 2017-12-22 23:52:36 +0000, RichA said:
On Thursday, 21 December 2017 07:50:42 UTC-5, RichA wrote:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42438745
Lawsuits:
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-42455285
This is like that egomaniacal a-- Elon Musk telling people if they use
their Tesla's for anything but personal driving, he'd cut off their
ability to charge.
Electrical cars are fuled by that that's i the socket of your wall. Whatever!
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=tessla+taxi&iax=images&ia=images&iaf=size%3Aima gesize-large
Maybe a clarification is in order: Electricity are not self generated
so if the last kWh is generated with coal then it's coal that powers
your car and so on... Every time you make an energy conversion from
like coal to electricity you have huge looses in energy efficiency.
Conclusion: electrical cars won't be safe to environment until we
generate electricity with hydrogen reactors.
... or new types of nuclear reactors.
Fission, uranium reactors are safe handled safely. Fusion, hydrogen
would be even safer, unless Goldfinger gets the one he has on
backorder...
Molten salt reactors are even better.
MSRs are fission reactors and there will be waste. They have different
coolant but the nuclear process is the same. Keep it simple 'till you
know what you're doing... Fussion is the future.
--
teleportation kills