Thread: Ripe Apples
View Single Post
  #67  
Old November 14th 17, 07:55 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Ripe Apples

In article , PeterN
wrote:


and if you're going to be looking at the images on a ****ty srgb
display, then you might as well get a ****ty srgb display to begin
with, along with a ****ty compact digicam, as you'll never be able to
see the difference.

Well maybe there would be more tonality in the shadow areas in the image
produced using my monitor.


complete nonsense.


If you actually produced images


back to your insults, again.

you would know it 8is not.


i know that it's nonsense.

The good
people at Apple agree. Indeed when I asked them, they were specific
about the issue with the darker areas.


either you're lying or they were very mistaken.

if it was actually an issue (which it isn't), it would be widely
discussed on the various photo sites. it's not.

it's complete fabrication.

the reality is that the retina display is considered to be the best in
the biz, which shatters your absurd claim that the shadow tonality is
poor.

you've never even used it, have you?

what is the benefit of your 36mp camera, versus a more affordable 24 mp?

Not a valid comparison.


it's a very valid comparison.

you asked:
Do you really need a screen of that density, when your images are going
to be seen on screens with much lower density?


you don't 'need' a 36 mp camera when your images are displayed on
smaller displays or printed smaller than 20x24 or so (which from what
you've said is the case).


If all my images were full frame, and only displayed on monitors, you
would be correct. Your assumption is wrong.


nope.

a typical non-retina 27" display has 2560x1440 pixels, or just under 4
mp. perhaps you should be using your daughter's 6 mp nikon d70.

I get my cameras for what I expect to use then
for. my D500 has less and smaller pixels than the D800. yet I use them
both, as well as my 8800, P&S.


completely missing the point.

At least you admit that you did.


nope.