"John Emmons" wrote in message
...
Of course the photos he takes will tell you more about the methods he
employs then they will of the subject.

I'm reminded of other "projects" where otherwise intelligent photographers
used equipment unsuited for the job at hand simply to have a hook for
publication.

When the camera used becomes the story, the photojournalist has failed.

I sense a real sour grapes attitude. Now tell us exactly what equipment
SHOULD a PJ use?