View Single Post
  #4  
Old May 26th 05, 07:56 PM
John
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Thu, 26 May 2005 06:28:31 -0500, "johnboy" wrote:

John wrote in message ...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 20:20:29 -0500, "johnboy" wrote:

If you are thinking of moving up to LF,


If you're moving to LF then I also suggest you consider 5X7 which has :
[... snipped the good stuff ...]


So true, John. When I finally became handy with 4x5 it seemed so _small_,
and 5x7 and 8x10 began to look good.


I just wish someone would have told me the same thing 10 years ago when I bought
my first 4X5. Oh it's a good format for commercial work (what hasn't gone to digital) but
when I hold a 5X7 negative up to compare with one of my 5X7's ....... it just isn't a fair
comparison ;))

JD - www.puresilver.org