On Fri, 28 Aug 2015 00:26:05 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


Rumours seem to be writ large in their objectives.

I didn't think you an innocent. Most companies make sure the "rumour"
mill (industry new sources) are well filled with "rumours". This
generates fan enthusiasm, competitor envy (and mistakes) and most
importantly keeps people from spending on other brands until the widget
actually appears.

That's not the point at issue. The question is whether or not 'Nikon
Rumours' deals in rumours. PeterN thought that they did. I cited their
home page and some content to say that *some* of their stuff is
clearly labeled rumour. nospam is arguing that their use of the word
'rumour' does not mean that they deal with rumours.

you just confirmed what i have been saying.

Good Lord!

What do you think you have been saying?
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens