On Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:53:08 -0400, nospam wrote:

In article , SPAM ALERT
wrote:

On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:32:55 -0600, "Roger N. Clark (change username to
spammer)" wrote:

I invite everyone to view my "crappy" photos at:
http://www.spamvision.com

Good photographers don't have to invite anyone. This is self-evident proof
that you really do have "crappy" photography. The only time anyone goes to
look at your snapshots is when you spam the hell out of some newsgroup or
forum to manipulate them into doing so.

roger is not spamming. he has contributed far more to this group than
you ever have, so kindly **** off.

How would you know, you've never been right about even one thing concerning
photography. Not only that but Clark's pages and data have been
consistently wrong too. I've proved it, many many times.

Here's just one example, where he doesn't even measure dynamic range of
sensors properly.

http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3142/...7ceaf3a1_o.jpg

He's a proven biased DSLR-Troll and Spammer, nothing more. He posts
controversial crap just to get people to his web pages to sell his
beginner's snapshots. He's never been more than that.