On 2018-01-24 15:54:45 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 14:51:33 UTC, android wrote:
On 2018-01-24 13:26:42 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 11:57:25 UTC, android wrote:
On 2018-01-24 10:08:24 +0000, Whisky-dave said:
On Wednesday, 24 January 2018 06:24:51 UTC, Sandman wrote:
https://www.diyphotography.net/amazi...canada-took-6-
weeks-shoot-9-months-edit
"Every once in a while, a timelapse comes along that just takes
your breath away. You could take almost any frame from such films
and it stands up on its own as a still photography. Alive, by
German filmmaker Florian “Flo” Nick, is one such timelapse
film. It was shot over 5,500km travelled in six weeks exploring the
vast landscapes of Alberta and British Columbia. And it’s is
absolutely beautiful."
--
Sandman
As yet I've not been able to find out what process i.e software he
used for this, plenty of info on what cameras and lenses, maybe
I've missed it.
Beneath the fourth slide:
"For the footage, Flo used his Sony A7SII along with Canon 16-35mm
f/4 and Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 lenses. For the night shots, he also
used a Pentax-X 50mm f/1.7 and 100mm f/2.8.* He says that motion
control camera movement was done using the eMotimo Spectrum ST4
and ifootage Shark slider"
No not really that just list what he used over the 6 weeks to capture
the images.
Oki... I kind of deleted my reply to your post within minutes after posting...
"Alive took 9 months for Flo to create once he got back home with all
the images."
So 6 weeks to capture the images and 9 months to edit them, I doubt he
was using a slow compter perhaps he used a phone to edit them
together this is what I was wondering about as it took 9 months.
So much more time was spent putting the images together than taking them.
which is unusual, well from what I usually watch timescale wise.
A picture usually takes 1/125s to capture so 50000 slides would have
taken him 6 min and 40 sec to capture...
No, he said that took him 6 weeks not 6 mins.
He took 50000 slides and a slide is about 1/125s of exposure. So the
time it took him to capture whatever was 50000/125s and that equals 6
minutes and 40 seconds! Me mum had deeep concerns 'bout the English
educational system. She was a teacher of sorts...
9 months of editing! :-ppp
A bit like being pregnant, one of my ex flatmates was called Flo.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mVdctus20c8
Such as wildlife programs where cameramen spend months getting enough
footage for a 2 mins shot.
He used LRTimelapse, I was wondering whether he used Mac Windows or linux.
So I was just wondering what takes 9 months was it processing or
deciding what images comes next.
So you knew that already!
Yes but not which platform and perhaps why.
--
teleportation kills