View Single Post
  #43  
Old August 24th 16, 01:07 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
Eric Stevens
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 13,611
Default Nikon regresses in the low end, leaving one to wonder about their situation

On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:42:18 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Eric Stevens
wrote:


a box brownie was a mirrorless camera too.


No it wasn't. They usually had two view finders (for portrait and
landscape) with mirrors in each.


there were a *lot* of brownie cameras, most *without* a mirror.

there's no mirror on these:
http://www.brownie-camera.com/5.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/5-2.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/95.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/7.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/41.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/83.shtml

but these did:
http://www.brownie-camera.com/32.shtml
http://www.brownie-camera.com/33.shtml


Of all the URLs you have cited above only the first relates to the
subject of discussion, the *box* brownie. That site describes the
optional view finder available after 1900. At some stage the view
finders were built into the camera. e.g.
http://www.brownie-camera.com/50.jpg and later
http://www.nigel-roberts.info/images...ox-Brownie.jpg

More Box Brownies were built after 1900 than before and it is
virtually certain that most of these had view finders.

If you insist that the name Brownie includes more than the Box
Brownie, perhaps you should also include http://tinyurl.com/h5y8kdb
--

Regards,

Eric Stevens