On 2018-02-01 10:55:44 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

On Thursday, 1 February 2018 10:00:27 UTC, android wrote:
On 2018-02-01 09:44:54 +0000, Whisky-dave said:

On Thursday, 1 February 2018 03:36:33 UTC, android wrote:
...into the French group and found this link:

http://blog.grainedephotographe.com/chutes-comiques-improbables-sandro-giordano/



--
teleportation kills

That does look like a fun photo-shoot, but it's all fake imagery, I
blame Trump for all this fake stuff ;-)

Blame on, but this seem real enough not to Photoshopped though. Beware,
the photog could sue you for slander if you say that these are fake!
:-ppp

Actually it'd be defamation rather than slander as slander only really
refers to speech or audio content ;P

And note I said fake imagery NOT fake photgraphy, as photography it's
fine but I do not believe these images represent real events such as
accidents or situations.

Slander is a form of deamation that that you are after is libel. Libel
is written defamation but slander is defamation in a more transitory
form, like speech, Usenet and Twitter posts and updates on Facebook.

"Slander
The common law origins of defamation lie in the torts of "slander"
(harmful statement in a transient form, especially speech) and "libel",
each of which gives a common law right of action."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation#Slander
--
teleportation kills