In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote:

Seeing 8x10 images in the flesh is an experience. Will be a while before
digital really matches it and yet it will never look the same.

it's already surpassed it.

Care to point a link to a digital camera with a sensor that big, and
that can be "twisted" as his?

it doesn't need to be anywhere near that big and tilt/shift lenses,
what you call 'twisted' are both available and also not needed.

he is stuck in the past and more than likely doesn't realize that what
he's doing in the *eight* *hours* per photo can be done digitally in a
tiny fraction of that time, with much better and more consistent
results.

the fact that he claims a 2d print has depth tells all.