SLRs Make Less Sense With Digital ?
On 2018-09-09 22:49:57 +0000, RichA said:
On Sunday, 9 September 2018 17:39:14 UTC-4, Savageduck wrote:
wrote:
The SLR was a great idea when needed to have a seperate path for
viewing and film exposure, but with digital, the sensor can be the
viewing as well as the recording medium so perhaps less need for a
seperate path via flip up miror ?
...and that is exactly why mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras are
gaining favor. With the FF MILCs it is also a market Nikon, and Canon have
finally entered even though they did so 5 years late. They still have a way
to go to catch up with Sony in that market, and they are not even
contesting the APS-C, or M43 MILC market.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
TEN YEARS late. The Panasonic G1 was launched in 2007. Nikon and
Canon let others do the ground-work.
I was refering to FF MILC not APS-C, or M43 MILC, that would be about 5
years. Before that Nikon had their pathetic *1* cameras which were MILC.
--
Regards,
Savageduck
|