In message , Char Jackson
writes:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2017 09:54:41 +0000 (UTC), harry newton
wrote:

You [John] don't seem to appreciate the efficiency of vi, but I do.
It just means we place different values on different things.

As long as you accept that the efficiency of which you speak comes as a

He won't (-:

result of familiarity, not anything inherently efficient about the
product. If you look at it objectively, it's among the least efficient
tools, wouldn't you agree?

He won't (-:

[It (vi, emacs, and similar] _is_ a good editor, and _can_ do things a
lot of others can't. But I think it's more suited to a command-line
environment.]
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

Advertising is legalized lying. - H.G. Wells