On 25-May-18 2:30 PM, Whisky-dave wrote:
On Friday, 25 May 2018 11:06:23 UTC+1, David B. wrote:
On 25-May-18 10:49 AM, Whisky-dave wrote:
davidB took SD's image that SD voluntarily shared knowing full well that is could be copied under the standard T&Cs that are creative commons license which DOES allow copying.

Morning Dave! :-)

Afternoon :-)

Point taken! Good afternoon. :-)

I need a reminder! Are you referring to the image of Savageduck's Cheetah?

Yes, as I assume that is an appropriate description of the image.

Thanks.

If so, I did not 'take' the image, I simple shared a link provided by
Savageduck which enabled folk to view the image in Savageduck's Dropbox
folder.

Yes, so I don't know how that is classed as a theft by some on here.
Perhaps they could explain, but don't hold your breathe.

We, you and I, appear to believe the same things.

If you viewed it then it would be in some cache file and if you backed up your computer theres a chance that image would be backed up too and perhaps stored on a server, owned by a company. That isn't theft either.

I've searched my computers .... and sadly haven't found the image. :-(

He's since chosen to withdraw that privilege, as is his right.

Yes and I understand why, it's not you he doesn't trust as such but he doesn't know what someone outside this NG might use this image for, especially when placed on Facebook or similar site(s) which neither you or SD has any control over.

I do completely understand.

We would all like to be in control of our image(s).

Indeed! I can't quite understand why you don't use a spellchecker!

Some reading here might imagine you to be dislectix! ;-)

(Sorry, couldn't help myself!)

--
D.