On Sun, 27 May 2012 22:44:15 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg
wrote:

TheRealSteve wrote:
On Fri, 25 May 2012 23:40:16 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg
TheRealSteve wrote:
On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:34:36 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg
TheRealSteve wrote:
On Mon, 21 May 2012 04:07:54 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg

OK, have it your way! Here's a 5D Mark III, here's a D800, please
tell me which 24 or 36 MPix (MPics as per *your* definition)
Foveon camera should be compared against them. Thank you in
advance.

More proof that you haven't got a clue as to what has to be made equal
in order to compare sensor resolution.

Please name the best Foveon FF camera. Don't hand wave.

I have no idea nor do I care what the best Foveon FF camera is.

more handwaving, and proof you're not comptent to discuss Foveon.

See, there's a non-sequitur. Just because someone doesn't know or care
what the best Foveon FF camera is has absolutely no bearinig on their
competency to discuss the technology and resolution of the Foveon
sensor.

And the Pope is the right person to discuss the finer points of
practical sexuality between 2 or more women and which sex toys
work for them.

Yet another non-sequitur. You're really getting good at this.


So without even knowing what the term non-sequitur means, you
just gave the perfect example of one. Congrats!

Nope, you really need to look up the term.

Lol. You mean you're not even trying to reply with non-sequiturs and
you actually think you are making sense? That's sad.