In rec.photo.digital carlislestamford wrote:

| There is not a large outcry for UV and IR capable cameras. I would be first in
| line to buy an inexpensive tri-bandwidth (IR, Vis, UV) performer, but I'm the
| exception rather than the rule. I wish my camera to be able to image in all the
| frequencies that could be captured by a CCD array. As well as record audio from
| sub-sonic to ultra-sonic frequencies. Your average person has no concern over
| what they can't see nor sense, out of sight -- out of mind. They have no
| curiosity about something that is beyond their crippled perception of reality.

Many years ago I was actually thinking about a design for "an antenna camera"
to produce some rough imaging of RF frequencies. It would, of course, have to
be a huge array to get anything approaching a "picture" below the microwave
frequencies. It might be interesting to do this from a distance "looking" at
the downtown area of a major city, and merge the 124000000nm to 120000000nm
view with the 700nm to 400nm view to see all the wifi radiation spots.

--
|WARNING: Due to extreme spam, googlegroups.com is blocked. Due to ignorance |
| by the abuse department, bellsouth.net is blocked. If you post to |
| Usenet from these places, find another Usenet provider ASAP. |
| Phil Howard KA9WGN (email for humans: first name in lower case at ipal.net) |