This old Bob wrote:
"Peter" wrote in message
...
Well, after deciding between the 17-55, 24-70 and the 24-105, I have
decided to go for the 24-105 for my 20D.

I rarely take photos below 24mm on the 20D as most of my shots are people
shots. So, any objections?

You mean, a 38mm to 168mm, right? As long as you don't want something in
the background showing where they are, you should be fine.

Well, not really! It's a 24-105, and yes, on the 20D the figs you quote
are useful. But it'll be its stated figs. in all respects on a ff camera.

It's a fine lens; I use it a lot.

--
john mcwilliams