On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 08:15:20 +0000 (GMT), (Brian
{Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:

On Tuesday, in article

"Big Bill" wrote:

On Tue, 01 Mar 2005 19:45:39 +0000 (GMT), (Brian
{Hamilton Kelly}) wrote:

On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:57:15 -0700, in article

"Big Bill" wrote:

So how is Google preventing victims from finding the perp?

They are aiding and abetting the perpetrator(s) by failing to reject
posts made through well-known open proxies, thus facilitating continued
libellous postings.

I have a problem with shutting out legitimate users on the chance that
you'll also shut out people who do things we don't like. Even illegal
things.

Why should a "legitimate" user have any need to go via an open proxy?
There is no reason not to go directly to the posting site; using a proxy
is either a vector for mischief, or someone attempting to circumvent his
employer's strictures against use of facilities not approved by policy.

This ISP has no legitimate users?

--
Bill Funk
Change "g" to "a"