Whisky-dave
Mon, 23
Apr 2018 10:20:23 GMT in rec.photo.digital, wrote:

On Friday, 20 April 2018 22:01:26 UTC+1, David_B wrote:
On 20-Apr-18 9:25 PM, Savageduck wrote:


I appreciate your response and for the historical insights.

I personally believe that few criminals would have imagined that
the police could have identified someone from an online
photograph of a hand!

Luckily most criminals are pretty stupid, some take selfies with
lots of money around them or do youtube videos of themselves doing
a ton down the motorway, I guess they were suprised that a photo
could be used to read finger prints and related imagary from high
resolution cameras. Surely they have heard of those space cameras
controlled by the CIA, FBI and the secret services that can pick
out a pimple on a pimple on a pigs arse from space.

Some even go so far as to upload something that doesn't belong to
them to youtube, post the url, and challenge the rightful owner of
the video to do something about it. Yes, David IS that kind of
stupid. Not only was the video removed from his channel, google also
found a copy present on his google drive and removed that too for me.
I know this only because he posted complaining (no, really, he did)
that google had done that to him.

To Davids credit, although he's not the brightest criminal, his gift
of gab does allow him to easily phish for new victims and/or
assistance in dealing with the ones he already has. So long as he
posts to a newsgroup where he wasn't already a regular and isn't
'known' for what he is, just yet. If he's posting to a forum instead,
it's likely via a new account he created due to the prior one(s)
getting banned for repeat forum rules violations.

He believes ban evasion is perfectly okay and he has the right to
use/abuse another persons/companies equipment and network resources
as he likes. Even if he's already been told he's not welcome there.

He comes across as an innocent person, and within a short period of
time, exposes his nature. Usually not before BSing one or more
regulars of the newsgroup, though.

At last count, he got HH, SavageDuck, possibly yourself and another I
can't remember the posting nym of. I do believe that when he abused
the information he learned from private (email?) correspondence with
Savageduck that mrDuck realized, hey, gee, maybe the guys who arrived
after David and posted warnings about him were right after all.

A little too late in his case though, David has already addressed him
by what one can only assume is his first name. Hopefully mr duck
didn't get too personal beyond that. If he did, it's only a matter of
time before Savageduck says or does something that irks David enough
to drop more personal information to bring Savageduck back in
'check' if you will.

Alas, some people really are the kind that have to learn the hard
way. Hopefully you aren't one of them. If you are, well, don't say I
didn't warn you.



--
To prevent yourself from being a victim of cyber
stalking, it's highly recommended you visit he
https://tekrider.net/pages/david-brooks-stalker.php
================================================== =
Without Time, everything would happen at once