View Single Post
  #766  
Old October 13th 14, 09:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
nospam
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 24,165
Default Is RGB to Lab lossy? - was( Lenses and sharpening)

In article , PeterN
wrote:

The fact is that very little can be done in any plug-in that can't be
done in PS.

completely false.

if that were the case, then there would be no need for plug-ins.

Bad logic. Some plug-ins allow for faster processing. Also, do learn to
read, I said nothing about speeding up workflow.


take your own advice, do learn to read. i didn't say anything about
speeding up workflow at all.


Never said you did. Indeed, your commengt totally ignored that potential


i did not ignore anything.

your statement is bull****. period.

as usual, you refuse to admit you're wrong and are twisting things into
something entirely different.

Almost anything can be done in both RGB & LAB. LAB is a lot
easie, and faster for some processes.

very few and not without a cost.

You just don't know how to use lAB, and won't admit that.


i've forgotten more about lab that you'll ever know.


YOur comments about LAB do support your statement.


at least you admit you know nothing about lab.

that gives more flexability, which is a good thing. Getting into a tool
war, is meaningless, unless there is a reasonable accurate description
of what eah plug-in does.

Habing said that, I am annoyed that the oil paint filter was removed
from CC 2014.

third party opportunity.

Yup


then why are you annoyed?


I do not see a rational reason why I should have to use one. I had
eliminated Painter from my workflow, and missed the upgrade window.


nobody said you had to use one.