In article , MC
wrote:

It seems that "Apple envy" is the only comback these two Apple fanbois
have in their armoury when it comes to describing anybody who even
slightly disses their beloved Apple. They must lay awake all night
fretting that anyone should dare cast negative comment.

nope. dissing isn't the problem.

it's *false* comments, especially ones made out of ignorance, that are
the problem.

apple does a lot of things wrong, but the haters never seem to figure
out what they are. all they can manage is spewing the same old boring
and known to be false myths, like price.

They do say that those in denial are the one to bite hardest in the
hope all it will all go away.

that would describe you. you'd prefer if those refuting your bogus
claims would just go away because you don't want to be embarrassed any
further than you already have.

In this instant, denial that Apple are
becoming very ordinary in the tech world and that they are still paying
a premium for the privilage to stay on the Apple mediocrity carousel.

even more false comments.

there is no price premium nor is there anything mediocre about apple.

it's actually the opposite:
https://www.jamf.com/blog/debate-ove...acs-are-535-le
ss-expensive-than-pcs/
...With more employees choosing Mac than ever before, the company now
has 90,000 deployed (with only five admins supporting them), making
it the largest Mac deployment on earth.
....
...IBM found that not only do PCs drive twice the amount of support
calls, they¹re also three times more expensive. That¹s right,
depending on the model, IBM is saving anywhere from $273 - $543 per
Mac compared to a PC, over a four-year lifespan. ³And this reflects
the best pricing we¹ve ever gotten from Microsoft,² Previn said.
Multiply that number by the 100,000+ Macs IBM expects to have
deployed by the end of the year, and we¹re talking some serious
savings.

tl;dr - ibm is paying a premium to use windows pcs, several million
dollars worth.