Robert Coe wrote:
On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 02:37:11 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg
: Robert Coe wrote:
: On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 11:27:56 +0200, Wolfgang Weisselberg

: : Doesn't say much about problems with QC. You two 'lucked out'
: : and got a good copy. Noone says Sigma cannot build good lenses
: : --- only that they don't do that consistently enough for comfort.

: How many Sigma lenses have you ever owned, Wolfgang? How good
: were they?

: I shall refer you to lensrentals.com, who have owned *many* dozen.

: Another 1 or 3 or 10 lenses from me doesn't make a difference
: to statistics. Just as one lottery winner doesn't mean every
: ticket wins the main price.

In other words, none. I thought as much.

Looks like you try to invent facts.


Since I suppose you'll ask, or assume, my wife and I own four of them. Are
they the best lenses we own? No. But all have been a very good value for the
money.

Ok. You own *F*O*U*R* Sigma lenses. Probably bought over
several years. How many percent of Sigma's lenses are they?

Consider: their annual turnover is 36 billion yen (that's roughly
450 million USD).

See the point why 4 so-so-but-real-cheap lenses just don't say much?
We get many more 1 million EUR lottery winners per year ...
from a single lottery.

-Wolfgang