Thread: Photo Printer
View Single Post
  #9  
Old January 26th 06, 08:44 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Photo Printer

Epson

Ink expensive
Ink Cartridges Jokingly small
Ink Head Clogg
Waste Lots of Ink Unclogging Heads
Waste Lots of Ink You Have to Replace An Ink Cartridge, They all get cycled.
Epson Does Everything They Can To Waste Expensive Ink

Canon

Faster
Does Well On Just About Any Paper (including my favorite art paper)
Ink Cartridges Are Bigger
Easier to Get Third Party Inks
Better Drivers

My 2 cents


"Steven Toney" wrote in message
news:6v2Cf.26110$CV.8274@dukeread03...
I looked at the R2400 -- I think I like the iP9900 a bit better

What are the pros and cons between these two as you see them - anyone
actually used them for some time?

thanks for all the comments


"frederick" wrote in message
news:1138177747.972483@ftpsrv1...
Steven Toney wrote:
I about to buy a photo printer to do 8x10 or slightly larger prints

I believe I'm going to get the Canon IP9900

comments??

Look also at Epson R1800, Epson R2400, HP8750, and Kodak 1400 dye-sub
printers. All have some specific advantages and possibly some
disadvantages over the iP9900.