"Jeremy" wrote

"Kiddie porn", if it doesn't actually involve real incidents of rape,
is
nothing more than lewd photos. As such, it is quite unsurprising to
see the
moral majority step in and outlaw such victimless crimes.

You must be some kind of pervert, to suggest that, short of RAPE, it is OK
for children to be exploited in this way.

Your trying to associate PARENTS with the radical far right, because we
are
opposed to anyone's children being USED just so creeps like you can get
off,
is typical of the agenda of most sexual miscreants.

Are you a member of N.A.M.B.L.A., too ("The North American Man-Boy Love
Association"), whose motto is "Sex before eight, or it's too late."

Grow up and get yourself a real woman, you sick *******.

Okay... obvious troll, however it brings up an interesting tangent.

Let's say some twisted perv, named "Jeremy" for example, goes to a public
beach and snaps a bunch of pictures of little Johnny swimming nude. Now,
let's say Jeremy then enjoys "getting off" on the pictures in the privacy of
his own home. Where's the harm? Where's the victim? Nobody is hurt by that
action, any more than some pervert taking pictures of women at the beach and
"getting off" on them at home.

Yet, I'd be willing to bet that 90% of people would claim Jeremy should be
jailed. Ridiculous! Go after people that do real harm. They're the ones that
should be stopped. The State has no business being a moral guardian. Every
time they do so, they end up screwing it up.