View Single Post
  #51  
Old January 31st 16, 03:41 PM posted to rec.photo.digital
PeterN[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 4,254
Default Nikon raises prices and LIES about the cost of raw materialsincreasing

On 1/31/2016 8:02 AM, Tony Cooper wrote:
On Sun, 31 Jan 2016 04:24:54 -0800, Savageduck
wrote:

On 2016-01-31 09:25:56 +0000, "J. Clarke" said:

In article 2016013014581534441-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
says...
On 2016-01-30 22:37:03 +0000, nospam said:
In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:


You are required to carry insurance on your automobile and on your
house (if you have a mortgage), but you are not required to buy a
camera.

Eh, you're not "required" to buy a house or a car, either... Not sure what
you
meant here.

If you have a car or a house, you are required to insure it.

not always.

In California proof of insurance is a requirement for annual registration.

You're assuming that one wants to register the car in question.


Correct. If you choose to have a non-operating vehicle your
registration is $10/year.

If you are a home owner it is usually prudent to protect your
investment.

It's prudent but not mandatory.


Agreed.

If you are still paying a mortgage the lender is going to
require insurance.


...but if you use nospam's mortgage lender you can drop the insurance
whenever you choose. ;-)


And live in the car.


Or your mother's basement.


--
PeterN