On 2018-03-16 18:17, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote:

but can be compensated.

compensated is the wrong word, and shows your lack of understanding
about basic photography.

what you're calling 'compensated' must be done for *every* photo,
regardless of subject.


Only for light intensity, not hue or temp.

nope. it's trivial to adjust for hue or temp, what experienced
photographers (i.e., not you) call white balance, which can even be
done *after* the photo was taken (without loss).

You are proving that you don't know your subject.

nope. what *you* are doing is showing that you haven't a ****ing clue.

Your opinion and insults are discarded and ignored.

translated: you can't back up your claims. you are wrong and refuse to
admit it.

I don't need to back ours...

yes you do if you want to claim i'm wrong.

simply saying i'm wrong ain't gonna cut it.

And _we_ say you are wrong. Not I, but we.


you do.

i did, as have countless photographers going back many decades.

Prove it.

Here it is only you supporting that claim.

you haven't a clue and refuse to learn.


I'm still waiting for your link supporting the X7 is crap.

--
Cheers, Carlos.