View Single Post
  #10  
Old May 5th 16, 05:38 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default Bad photo? Just call it "Fine Art"

In article 2016050421191266420-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:

On 2016-05-05 04:10:30 +0000, Bill W said:

On Thu, 05 May 2016 05:54:54 +0200, android wrote:

In article ,
Ken Hart wrote:

On 05/04/2016 06:03 PM, Ron C wrote:

Saw this photo for sale on twitter and just had to post
here for comments.
~~
Marcus Dagan ?@marcusdagan 1h1 hour ago

New artwork for sale! - "Philadelphia Abstract" -
http://fineartamerica.com/featured/p...poets-eye.html
‰?› @fineartamerica
~~
For those not doing twitter I put a copy in my dropbox:

https://www.dropbox.com/s/1po3on0jio...Art-1.jpg?dl=0
~~
I don't know ...is this guy a marketing genus?

==
Later...
Ron C

I'm not sure if "genius" is the right word, but he's a marketing
something.

‰?œThere‰?™s a sucker born every minute.‰?? P. T. Barnum‰?™s rival David
Hannum

You bound to get something cute sooner or later if you make handheld
nightshots like that.

Get Ya cam and mount a 200mm and set it on 1/2s and you'r goolden...


You have to admit the photo is unique. It could be impossible to
exactly duplicate that camera shake.


...and that makes it an accident, not a work of art.


Artident...
--
teleportation kills