May 5th 16, 05:38 AM
posted to rec.photo.digital
|
|
Bad photo? Just call it "Fine Art"
In article 2016050421191266420-savageduck1@REMOVESPAMmecom,
Savageduck wrote:
On 2016-05-05 04:10:30 +0000, Bill W said:
On Thu, 05 May 2016 05:54:54 +0200, android wrote:
In article ,
Ken Hart wrote:
On 05/04/2016 06:03 PM, Ron C wrote:
Saw this photo for sale on twitter and just had to post
here for comments.
~~
Marcus Dagan ?@marcusdagan 1h1 hour ago
New artwork for sale! - "Philadelphia Abstract" -
http://fineartamerica.com/featured/p...poets-eye.html
? @fineartamerica
~~
For those not doing twitter I put a copy in my dropbox:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1po3on0jio...Art-1.jpg?dl=0
~~
I don't know ...is this guy a marketing genus?
==
Later...
Ron C
I'm not sure if "genius" is the right word, but he's a marketing
something.
?There?s a sucker born every minute.?? P. T. Barnum?s rival David
Hannum
You bound to get something cute sooner or later if you make handheld
nightshots like that.
Get Ya cam and mount a 200mm and set it on 1/2s and you'r goolden...
You have to admit the photo is unique. It could be impossible to
exactly duplicate that camera shake.
...and that makes it an accident, not a work of art.
Artident...
--
teleportation kills
|