In article , Neil
wrote:

So, once again, if you think its low-resolution sensor will
produce better prints

WTF do yuo mean by better prints ?

You don't know what a print is?

he likely means what do you mean by 'better', not what a print is.

So, now you're his interpreter?

there's no need for an interpreter. it's quite clear what he meant, and
his response confirms it.

better is subjective. what *you* consider better is not necessarily
what others might consider better.

I was very specific in the parameters of the prints, which are GENERALLY
considered "better" by those who make prints. Go back and read it, as
I'm not interested in your straw men, either.

there is no straw man.