On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 04:32:32 GMT, "mrsgator88"
wrote:

Back in the day, photographers would extol (or decry) the virtues (or vices)
of the various films on the market. In reading the posts here, I haven't
noticed any discussion about the subjective quality of the various sensors
in the various cameras out there. I suppose I'm really thinking about color
rendition.

Before digital, what film you chose was important and could be quite the
topic of discussion. Now it seems that people are more concerned with card
compatibilitiy than color quality. In a recent thread several posters said
they wanted to use the same card in different cameras - but I've not noticed
discussion about which sensor gives a more pleasing rendition. I can still
remember the time when you carried an extra camera JUST to have a different
film with you!

Has this been discussed and I've just missed it? or does modern electronic
white-balancing mean that color rendition issues are no longer a concern?

Steve

All the sensor and A/D section of the camera does is count the number
of photoelectrons captured--a more or less accurate measure of the
tones in the scene photographed-- and create a black and white raw
image. It's not at all like fiilm where there are real physical and
chemical differences between the various brands.

If the only thing you use is the jpgs straight out of the camera, the
color quality is determined by the firmware in the camera and the
characterristics of whatever printer you use. And if you use a higher
end photoeditor correctly you can set you color quality just about any
way you like.

jpc