In article , Melanie van Buren
wrote:


How come google isn't able to quickly point you to such quality
versions and comes up with countless pages of useless garbage
versions instead?

Are there any useful tools that actually work to find you a *good* quality
version of an image instead of bringing you countless pages of
useless junk?

General algorithmic criteria and SEO at a guess.

it's nothing more than his inability to figure out how to properly do
an image search and then blame it on everything other than his own
ineptness.

I'm not aware that
Google or any other search engine rates images by quality either
technically or critically.

they absolutely do, and not just images.

The same is true for movies. If you did, for
example, a search on "thrillers movies 2020" you'd find most of the ones
suggested are simply the most promoted.

that depends on what someone searches for and how easily they give up
and then blame the search engine for not finding what they want.

There may also be a backlash
from copyright owners and copyright licensees if the best quality images
always came out top.

there was and they lost.