On 2018-03-16 03:52, nospam wrote:
In article , Carlos E.R.
wrote:


The pros is that it is cheap, but the cons is that it is only 5
megapixel. Ie, as good as a 5 megapixel camera. There are many in this
range.

actually, it's worse than a 5 mp camera for several reasons, including
having a low quality lens and low quality sensor.

there are cameras with *less* megapixels that can produce better
results.

The Reflecta X7 is 14 Megapixels, but costs four times more (£106.22 at
Amazon UK). Two seconds per photo, manual feed.

also junk, just slightly less so.

That's your opinion, not shared by others.

it's very easy to prove because quality can be objectively measured,
making it not an opinion, but an actual fact.

I'll play. How, exactly?

Did you actually test it and reported the results? Where is the link?


most others will agree, because it really is junk.

No, they don't.

I have only seen your opinion that it is, and several very detailed
opinions that it isn't.

As I have your track record in sight, I don't trust anything you say in
vehement terms.

--
Cheers, Carlos.