On Fri, 19 May 2017 19:03:13 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 5/19/2017 5:29 PM, Ron C wrote:
On 5/19/2017 5:59 AM, PeterN wrote:
On 5/18/2017 10:49 PM, Bill W wrote:
On Thu, 18 May 2017 22:46:09 -0400, PeterN
wrote:

On 5/18/2017 10:35 PM, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-05-19 02:26:04 +0000, PeterN
said:

On 5/18/2017 8:35 PM, Bill W wrote:


snip


Good to hear. I usually go for accuracy, but decided to just go with
what I felt looked nice to my eye.


I go for impression, rarely for accuracy.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/t2quthg7matfxs8/Boron%20Botanical1filtered.jpg?dl=0




Your are, if nothing else, artistically predictable. ;-)

My impression of a Chihuly.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/r8w53i3y3m9cv8m/Dale%20Chihuly1.jpg?dl=0

That man belongs in art prison for fraud.


You may not like it, but it is art. He has a major exhibit at the BBG.

Darn, for a moment I thought this thread was going to
drift in to the weird world of artistic impressions.

I wouldn't want this hanging on my wall, yet I guess it is art.

http://www.thefader.com/2017/05/18/jean-michel-basquiat-painting-sold-for-a-record-110-million

This is not a comment on that particular piece, but let's face it, no
matter what you come up with, somebody can find a way to call it art.
Everything is art to someone, until there is an agreed upon rigid
definition of art, which means everything is art forever.