On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 19:02:48 -0400, nospam
wrote:

In article , Tony Cooper
wrote:


you changed your statement from 'incapable' to 'unsatisfactory'. two
very different things.

Another thing you are not good at: reading with understanding. The
camera is incapable. The results are unsatisfactory. No change at
all in the statement.

if the camera was incapable, it would not work. that's what incapable
means.

No it doesn't. More ignorance on your part. If it doesn't work, it's
inoperative. Incapable means "unable to do or achieve something". What
the "something" is, is produce a satisfactory image.

Besides, I said the camera is "incapable of low-light photography at a
fast shutter speed at any ISO".

--
Tony Cooper - Orlando, Florida