Thread: OT Query
View Single Post
  #11  
Old April 26th 17, 11:39 AM posted to rec.photo.digital
android
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,854
Default OT Query

android Wrote in message:
Whisky-dave Wrote in message:
On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 18:46:44 UTC+1, android wrote:
On Tue, 25 Apr 2017 18:22:06 +0100, Whiskers
wrote in message :

On 2017-04-25, android wrote:
Whiskers Wrote in message:
On 2017-04-24, David B. wrote:
On 24/04/2017 19:31, Savageduck wrote:
On 2017-04-24 15:37:21 +0000, "David B."
said:

Back in 1982 - in the USA - how many folk taking photographs would
have still been using black and white film for everyday snapshots?

Just a rough guesstimate is all I'm after!

TIA for any ideas.

In 1982 for snapshots, probably less than 5%, probably much less.
The thing to differentiate here is the hobbyist/enthusiast
photographer who would be shooting and much of his/her own
processing from the snapshot shooter.

In 1982 the snapshot shooter was using Instamatics, disposable
cameras, and 35mm P&S cameras, with most processing done at photo
kiosks, and mail-in processors. Today they are using phone cameras
and very few bother with processing or printing any of their
snapshots.


That's much as I suspected.

Thanks, Savageduck :-)

I don't know about the USA, but in the UK by the mid 1980s it was
difficult to find commercial black and white developing and printing
services that were not either very expensive or very bad.

The 'chromogenic' monochrome films that were processed using the same
'C-41' chemistry as colour print films, appeared around this time and
were a partial solution for those wishing to take monochrome pictures
and have the developing and processing done for them.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
C-41_process#C-41_.22chromogenic.22_black-and-white_films

I remember those. This is what made me refrain from trying them
out: "These films work like any other C-41 film; development causes
dyes to form in the emulsion."
I continued with T-Max and me own little tanks!ヅ Ilford seem make
them still, if I read the article right so it ain't too late yet...

I remember having fun with the 'multi-speed' aspect of Ilford XP400, but
I never got around to doing my own C-41 processing. I still have my old
darkroom kit in boxes somewhere, and my cameras. I should dust them
off!

T-Max is regularly BW so I used D76.


I used acuspeed and HP4 and HP5 I started with out of date HP3 in 50ft rolls.

All the color that I did was some
Cibachrome but that took allot of time and my "lab" was a tad too adhoky
for that in the long run.


I don't rememeber Cibachrome taking much more time than doing B&W although getting the temps right was more tricky.


You did have to balance the colors, besides tonality a bit and
work with drums and stuff...


I must correct myself here. You could use a tray, with special
filter on the darkroom light and that was that that I did. Got
the drum later...

I tried agfachrome too but never really liked the colours compared with Cibachrome.


Agfachrome was a film...

I do rememeber the interesting smells of Cibachrome and the fizzing when adding the neutralizer.


I'm sure you did... :-!



--
Bats can't tell us apart!


----Android NewsGroup Reader----
http://usenet.sinaapp.com/