Wayne J. Cosshall wrote:
MarkČ wrote:
At risk of sounding rude... The commentary and adjectives used in
this "review" (3800) could be applied to just about ANY printer
currently on the market. -Nothing specific to this printer, and
ZERO details about anything. It was a nice thought, but I don't see how
this would help a serious,
discriminating shopper make a decision about this fairly serious
printer.
I've changed it from a review to impressions. Frankly I saw little
point in rehashing specifications, etc
Specifications wouldn't make it a review, either.
Normally, reviews include analysis and testing, with examples given and
results demonstrated (or at least detailed).
But your move to "impressions" is appropriate, I think.
-And good show...by not taking offense.
-MarkČ
--
Images (Plus Snaps & Grabs) by MarkČ at:
www.pbase.com/markuson