RichA wrote:
"Someone" posted that Canon said the new 1DMkIII has the finest images
of an DSLR, even better than their current FF models. I do not know
if this is true. But if it is, does it matter much? By Sept or so, a
new 5D (7D) will be out and it will likely be the number one imager at
that time. Then a new 1Ds will come out, and so on. Is there a point
in stating something is "the best" only to have it usurped of it's
title 4-6 months later? Why not just say that anything beyond 1.5 is
going to produce exceptional images and it is the other features of
the camera that should determine which one you buy, at least until
something really exceptional comes along?

So if that's the case why has Canon recalled the product?